Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38585300›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Comparative study of the gut microbial communities collected by scraping and swabbing in a fish model: a comprehensive guide to promote non-lethal procedures for gut microbial studies.

Alberto Ruiz, Silvia Torrecillas, Elena Kashinskaya, Karl B Andree, Mikhail Solovyev, Enric Gisbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alberto RuizAquaculture Program, Centre de La Ràpita, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), La Ràpita, Spain.
Silvia TorrecillasAquaculture Program, Centre de La Ràpita, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), La Ràpita, Spain.
Elena KashinskayaInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Karl B AndreeAquaculture Program, Centre de La Ràpita, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), La Ràpita, Spain.
Mikhail SolovyevInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Enric GisbertAquaculture Program, Centre de La Ràpita, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), La Ràpita, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, we propose the use of swabs in non-lethal sampling procedures to collect the mucosa-adhered gut microbiota from the posterior intestine of fish, and therefore, we compare the bacterial communities collected by conventional scraping and by swabbing methods. For this purpose, samples of the posterior intestine of rainbow trout (

Indexed as

animal welfarefish microbiotaintestinemucosaMycoplasmareductionrefinementsampling procedure

Identifiers

PMID38585300
PMCPMC10997143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.