Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38585280›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024

Artificial cognition vs. artificial intelligence for next-generation autonomous robotic agents.

Giulio Sandini, Alessandra Sciutti, Pietro Morasso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Neural Simulation of Actions for Serpentine Robots.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giulio SandiniItalian Institute of Technology, Cognitive Architecture for Collaborative Technologies (CONTACT) and Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences (RBCS) Research Units, Genoa, Italy.
Alessandra SciuttiItalian Institute of Technology, Cognitive Architecture for Collaborative Technologies (CONTACT) and Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences (RBCS) Research Units, Genoa, Italy.
Pietro MorassoItalian Institute of Technology, Cognitive Architecture for Collaborative Technologies (CONTACT) and Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences (RBCS) Research Units, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The trend in industrial/service robotics is to develop robots that can cooperate with people, interacting with them in an autonomous, safe and purposive way. These are the fundamental elements characterizing the fourth and the fifth industrial revolutions (4IR, 5IR): the crucial innovation is the adoption of intelligent technologies that can allow the development of

Indexed as

body modeldevelopmental roboticsembodied cognitionneural simulation of actionsself-organizationsocial robotics

Identifiers

PMID38585280
PMCPMC10995397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.