Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38585210›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2024

Deep Learning Model for Real‑time Semantic Segmentation During Intraoperative Robotic Prostatectomy.

Sung Gon Park, Jeonghyun Park, Hong Rock Choi, Jun Ho Lee, Sung Tae Cho, Young Goo Lee, Hanjong Ahn, Sahyun Pak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence in urology training Enhancing annotation, feedback, and evaluation in robotic, laparoscopic, and endoscopic surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sung Gon ParkDepartment of Urology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Jeonghyun ParkSTARLABS Corp., Seoul, South Korea.
Hong Rock ChoiSTARLABS Corp., Seoul, South Korea.
Jun Ho LeeSTARLABS Corp., Seoul, South Korea.
Sung Tae ChoDepartment of Urology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Young Goo LeeDepartment of Urology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hanjong AhnDepartment of Urology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Sahyun PakDepartment of Urology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Recently, deep learning algorithms, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown remarkable progress in medical imaging analysis. Semantic segmentation, which segments an unknown image into different parts and objects, has potential applications in robotic surgery in areas where artificial intelligence (AI) can be applied, such as in AI-assisted surgery, surgeon training, and skill assessment. We aimed to investigate the performance of a CNN-based deep learning model in real-time segmentation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP). Methods: Intraoperative videos of RALP procedures were obtained. The reinforcement U-Net model was used for segmentation. Segmentation of the images of instruments, bladder, prostate, and seminal vesicle-vas deferens was performed. The dataset was preprocessed and split randomly into training, validation, and test data in a 7:2:1 ratio. Dice coefficient, intersection over union (IoU), and accuracy by class, which are commonly used in medical image segmentation, were calculated to evaluate the performance of the model. Key findings and limitations: From 120 patient videos, 2400 images were selected for RALP procedures. The mean Dice scores for the identification of the instruments, bladder, prostate, and seminal vesicle-vas deferens were 0.96, 0.74, 0.85, and 0.84, respectively. Overall, when applied to the test data, the model had a mean Dice coefficient value of 0.85, IoU of 0.77, and accuracy of 0.85. Limitations included the sample size, lack of diversity in the methods of surgery, incomplete surgical processes, and lack of external validation. Conclusions and clinical implications: The CNN-based segmentation provides accurate real-time recognition of surgical instruments and anatomy in RALP. Deep learning algorithms can be used to identify anatomy within the surgical field and could potentially be used to provide real-time guidance in robotic surgery. Patient summary: We demonstrate the potential effectiveness of deep learning segmentation in robotic prostatectomy procedures. Deep learning algorithms could be used to identify anatomical structures within the surgical field and may provide real-time guidance in robotic surgery.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningProstatectomySegmentation

Identifiers

PMID38585210
PMCPMC10998267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.