Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38585207›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2024

Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Renal Analysis: Automated Detection of Hydronephrosis and Precise Kidney Segmentation.

Radu Alexa, Jennifer Kranz, Rafael Kramann, Christoph Kuppe, Ritabrata Sanyal, Sikander Hayat, Luis Felipe Casas Murillo, Turkan Hajili, Marco Hoffmann, Matthias Saar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Radu AlexaDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Jennifer KranzDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Rafael KramannDepartment of Nephrology, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Hypertension, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Christoph KuppeDepartment of Nephrology, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Hypertension, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Ritabrata SanyalDepartment of Nephrology, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Hypertension, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Sikander HayatDepartment of Nephrology, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Hypertension, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Luis Felipe Casas MurilloComputer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, USA.
Turkan HajiliDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Marco HoffmannDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Matthias SaarDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Hydronephrosis is essential in the diagnosis of renal colic. We automated the detection of hydronephrosis from ultrasound images to standardize the therapy and reduce the misdiagnosis of renal colic. Methods: Anonymously collected ultrasound images of human kidneys, both normal and hydronephrotic, were preprocessed for neural networks. Six "state of the art" models were trained and cross-validated for the detection of hydronephrosis, and two convolutional networks were used for kidney segmentation. In the testing phase, performance metrics included true positives, true negatives, false positives, false negatives, accuracy, and F1 score, while the evaluation of the segmentation task involved accuracy, precision, dice, jaccard, recall, and ASSD. Key findings and limitations: A total of 523 sonographic kidney images (423 nonhydronephrotic and 100 hydronephrotic) were collected from three different ultrasound devices. After training on this dataset, all models were used to evaluate 200 new ultrasound kidney images (142 nonhydronephrotic and 58 hydronephrotic kidneys). The highest validation accuracy (98.5%) was achieved by the AlexNet model (GoogLeNet 97%, AlexNet_v2 96%, ResNet50 96%, ResNet101 97.5%, and ResNet152 95%). The deeplabv3_resnet50 and deeplabv3_resnet101 reached a dice coefficient of 94.74% and 94.48%, respectively, on the task of automated kidney segmentation. The study is limited by analyzing only hydronephrosis, but this specific focus enabled high detection accuracy. Conclusions and clinical implications: We show that our automated ultrasound deep learning model can be trained and used to interpret and segmentate ultrasound images from different sources with high accuracy. This method will serve as an automated tool in the diagnostic algorithm of acute renal failure in the future. Patient summary: Hydronephrosis is crucial in the diagnosis of renal colic. Recent advances in artificial intelligence allow automated detection of hydronephrosis in ultrasound images with high accuracy. These methods will help standardize the diagnosis and treatment renal colic.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceHydronephrosisNeuronal networksSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID38585207
PMCPMC10998270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.