ArticleEuropean urology open science2024
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Renal Analysis: Automated Detection of Hydronephrosis and Precise Kidney Segmentation.
Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in abdominal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Deep learning in renal ultrasound: applications, challenges, and future outlook.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Interoception, cardiac health, and heart failure: The potential for artificial intelligence (AI)-driven diagnosis and treatment.Physiological reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Hydronephrosis is essential in the diagnosis of renal colic. We automated the detection of hydronephrosis from ultrasound images to standardize the therapy and reduce the misdiagnosis of renal colic. Methods: Anonymously collected ultrasound images of human kidneys, both normal and hydronephrotic, were preprocessed for neural networks. Six "state of the art" models were trained and cross-validated for the detection of hydronephrosis, and two convolutional networks were used for kidney segmentation. In the testing phase, performance metrics included true positives, true negatives, false positives, false negatives, accuracy, and F1 score, while the evaluation of the segmentation task involved accuracy, precision, dice, jaccard, recall, and ASSD. Key findings and limitations: A total of 523 sonographic kidney images (423 nonhydronephrotic and 100 hydronephrotic) were collected from three different ultrasound devices. After training on this dataset, all models were used to evaluate 200 new ultrasound kidney images (142 nonhydronephrotic and 58 hydronephrotic kidneys). The highest validation accuracy (98.5%) was achieved by the AlexNet model (GoogLeNet 97%, AlexNet_v2 96%, ResNet50 96%, ResNet101 97.5%, and ResNet152 95%). The deeplabv3_resnet50 and deeplabv3_resnet101 reached a dice coefficient of 94.74% and 94.48%, respectively, on the task of automated kidney segmentation. The study is limited by analyzing only hydronephrosis, but this specific focus enabled high detection accuracy. Conclusions and clinical implications: We show that our automated ultrasound deep learning model can be trained and used to interpret and segmentate ultrasound images from different sources with high accuracy. This method will serve as an automated tool in the diagnostic algorithm of acute renal failure in the future. Patient summary: Hydronephrosis is crucial in the diagnosis of renal colic. Recent advances in artificial intelligence allow automated detection of hydronephrosis in ultrasound images with high accuracy. These methods will help standardize the diagnosis and treatment renal colic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.