Analyzing the Shortcomings of Trabecular Micro-bypass Stents for Surgical Management of Glaucoma.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Aqueous Angiography-Guided Bent Ab Interno Needle Goniectomy in High Versus Low Aqueous Humor Outflow Regions in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of glaucoma · 2025
   Trial
2. Twelve-Month Outcomes of iStent Infinite in Severe Open-Angle Glaucoma Compared with iStent Inject W in Mild-to-Moderate Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
   Article
3. Comparative Evaluation of Functional Aqueous Humor Outflow in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Versus Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma Using Aqueous Angiography.Journal of glaucoma · 2026
   Article
4. Efficacy and Safety of Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy and Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent in Combination with Cataract Extraction.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.