ArticleJournal of current glaucoma practice
Clinical Outcomes of MicroPulse Transscleral Laser Therapy with the Revised P3 Delivery Device.
Article in Journal of current glaucoma practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of micropulse transcleral cyclophotocoagulation using the original and revised pars plana probe.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation using different sweep velocity in the treatment of refractory glaucoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The effect of micropulse transcleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) on anterior segment properties in glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Outcomes of MicroPulseJournal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the success and safety of MicroPulse transscleral laser therapy (TLT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction in adults with uncontrolled glaucoma using different total treatment durations, sweep velocities, and a number of sweeps utilizing the revised MicroPulse P3 delivery device. Materials and methods: A single-center Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved multiple cohort studies of MicroPulse TLT with the revised MicroPulse P3 delivery device, which was conducted in 61 eyes from 40 adults with uncontrolled glaucoma. Eyes that received 50-second (GI, GII, and GIII) and 60-second (GIV, GV, and GVI) treatment applications between May and October 2020 were reviewed. Each hemisphere received a total of five, four, or three sweeps. The patient's IOP and glaucoma medications were monitored over 12 months follow-up. Qualified success was defined as an IOP of ≤21 mm Hg and/or reduction of ≥20% from baseline at 12 months, with no secondary glaucoma reinterventions. Complete success was defined as meeting the above criteria with no increase in glaucoma medications at 12 months. All eyes requiring a glaucoma surgical intervention were considered a failure. Results: Qualified success was achieved in 83.6% of eyes, while complete success was achieved in 75.4% of eyes. In eyes receiving 50-second applications of five, four, or three sweeps (GI, GII, and GIII), 70, 90, and 91% achieved qualified success, respectively; in eyes receiving 60-second applications of five, four, or three sweeps (GIV, GV, and GVI), 78, 82, and 90% achieved qualified success, respectively. Within each subgroup, mean IOP reductions ranged from 32.8 to 49.4% and were statistically significant ( Conclusions: MicroPulse TLT with the revised MicroPulse P3 delivery device and relatively low total energy levels is safe and effective at lowering IOP. Efficacy appears to increase with longer treatment durations and slower sweep velocities, but statistical differences between age and clinical differences between baseline IOP measurements limit comparison between subgroups. Clinical significance: There is a lack of literature evaluating the safety and IOP-lowering success of the revised MicroPulse P3 delivery device using different total treatment durations, sweep velocities, and number of sweeps. How to cite this article: Checo LA, Dorairaj S, Wagner IV,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.