ArticleJournal of current glaucoma practice
Glaucoma Drug Prescription Pattern in North India: Public vs Private Sector Hospitals.
Article in Journal of current glaucoma practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy associated with characteristic structural damage to the optic nerve and associated visual dysfunction that may be caused by various pathological processes. A number of pharmacological agents are used to reduce the intraocular pressure (IOP), involving the usage of two or three medications concurrently. Literature is sparse regarding prescription patterns of antiglaucoma drugs, especially regarding variability in public sector vs private sector hospitals. Drug utilization studies can add insight for crafting rational, affordable, and ocular surface friendly prescriptions. Aim: This study assessed the prescription pattern in glaucoma patients of a public sector, tertiary care hospital vs a private sector tertiary care hospital. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, pertinent data of diagnosed and labeled glaucoma patients were reviewed. Data collected included demographic details, type of glaucoma, number and nature of drugs prescribed, whether innovator or generic drugs were prescribed, if fixed-drug combinations (FDCs) and preservative-free formulations were prescribed. The prescription patterns between the two sectors were compared, as were the prescription patterns between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary angle-closure disease (PACD). Results: A total of 336 prescriptions were evaluated (216 from public sector, group I; 120 from private sector, group II). Travoprost 0.004% was the most prescribed antiglaucoma medication in both group I (30.09%) and group II (38.33%). Brimonidine and brinzolamide (14.17%) was the most prescribed combination in group II, while Brimonidine with Timolol (7.87%) in group I. In group I, Timolol and Travoprost were the most prescribed medications for both PACD and POAG. Conclusion: This study showed that both public sector as well as private sector tertiary care centers prescribe antiglaucoma medications in tune with current principles of rational drug use. Preservative-free drugs were preferred in both the groups for better adherence. How to cite this article: Bhartiya S, Ichhpujani P, Parmar UPS,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.