ArticleACS omega2024
Micromechanical Dilution of PLA/PETG-Glass/Iron Nanocomposites: A More Efficient Molecular Dynamics Approach.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced Antibacterial and Immunomodulatory Porphyrin-Based MOF Coatings for PETG Clear Aligners: A Comparative Study of Ag, Cu, and Ce Metal Centers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Influence of Carbonyl Iron Particles (CIP) and Glass Microspheres on Thermal Properties of Poly(lactic acid) (PLA).Polymers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polylactic acid (PLA) and poly(ethylene terephthalate glycol) (PETG) are popular thermoplastics used in additive manufacturing applications. The mechanical properties of PLA and PETG can be significantly improved by introducing fillers, such as glass and iron nanoparticles (NPs), into the polymer matrix. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with the reactive INTERFACE force field were used to predict the mechanical responses of neat PLA/PETG and PLA-glass/iron and PETG-glass/iron nanocomposites with relatively high loadings of glass/iron NPs. We found that the iron and glass NPs significantly increased the elastic moduli of the PLA matrix, while the PETG matrix exhibited modest increases in elastic moduli. This difference in reinforcement ability may be due to the slightly greater attraction between the glass/iron NP and PLA matrix. The NASA Multiscale Analysis Tool was used to predict the mechanical response across a range of volume percent glass/iron filler by using only the neat and highly loaded MD predictions as input. This provides a faster and more efficient approach than creating multiple MD models per volume percent per polymer/filler combination. To validate the micromechanics predictions, experimental samples incorporating hollow glass microspheres (MS) and carbonyl iron particles (CIP) into PLA/PETG were developed and tested for elastic modulus. The CIP produced a larger reinforcement in elastic modulus than the MS, with similar increases in elastic modulus between PLA/CIP and PETG/CIP at 7.77 vol % CIP. The micromechanics-based mechanical predictions compare excellently with the experimental values, validating the integrated micromechanical/MD simulation-based approach.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.