Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38585113›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Micromechanical Dilution of PLA/PETG-Glass/Iron Nanocomposites: A More Efficient Molecular Dynamics Approach.

William A Pisani, Dane N Wedgeworth, Jedadiah F Burroughs, Travis L Thornell, J Kent Newman, Manoj K Shukla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William A PisaniOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5172-862X
Dane N WedgeworthGeotechnical and Structures Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180, United States.
Jedadiah F BurroughsGeotechnical and Structures Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180, United States.
Travis L ThornellGeotechnical and Structures Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180, United States.
J Kent NewmanGeotechnical and Structures Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180, United States.
Manoj K ShuklaEnvironmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-1172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polylactic acid (PLA) and poly(ethylene terephthalate glycol) (PETG) are popular thermoplastics used in additive manufacturing applications. The mechanical properties of PLA and PETG can be significantly improved by introducing fillers, such as glass and iron nanoparticles (NPs), into the polymer matrix. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with the reactive INTERFACE force field were used to predict the mechanical responses of neat PLA/PETG and PLA-glass/iron and PETG-glass/iron nanocomposites with relatively high loadings of glass/iron NPs. We found that the iron and glass NPs significantly increased the elastic moduli of the PLA matrix, while the PETG matrix exhibited modest increases in elastic moduli. This difference in reinforcement ability may be due to the slightly greater attraction between the glass/iron NP and PLA matrix. The NASA Multiscale Analysis Tool was used to predict the mechanical response across a range of volume percent glass/iron filler by using only the neat and highly loaded MD predictions as input. This provides a faster and more efficient approach than creating multiple MD models per volume percent per polymer/filler combination. To validate the micromechanics predictions, experimental samples incorporating hollow glass microspheres (MS) and carbonyl iron particles (CIP) into PLA/PETG were developed and tested for elastic modulus. The CIP produced a larger reinforcement in elastic modulus than the MS, with similar increases in elastic modulus between PLA/CIP and PETG/CIP at 7.77 vol % CIP. The micromechanics-based mechanical predictions compare excellently with the experimental values, validating the integrated micromechanical/MD simulation-based approach.

Identifiers

PMID38585113
PMCPMC10993258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.