Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38585047›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Antioxidant Capacity, Sugar Content, and Tandem HPLC-DAD-ESI/MS Profiling of Phenolic Compounds from

Hatice Kubra Sasmaz, Ozlem Kilic-Buyukkurt, Serkan Selli, Mohamed Bouaziz, Hasim Kelebek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antidiabetic Potential ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Black Chokeberry Extracts (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hatice Kubra SasmazDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University, 01250 Adana, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4728-3151
Ozlem Kilic-BuyukkurtDepartment of Food Technology, Kadirli Applied Sciences School, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, 80760 Osmaniye, Turkey.
Serkan SelliDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Cukurova University, 01330 Adana, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0450-2668
Mohamed BouazizLaboratory of Electrochemistry and Environment, National Engineering School of Sfax, University of Sfax, BP 1173, Sfax 3038, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-7027
Hasim KelebekDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University, 01250 Adana, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8419-3019

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the phenolic profile, sugar composition, and antioxidant capacities of chokeberry fruits and leaves obtained from four different Turkiye provinces. A total of 21 phenolics including phenolic acid and its derivatives, flavanols, anthocyanins, and flavonols were determined in the fruits, while the leaves had 19 phenolics, including phenolic acid and its derivatives, flavanols, and flavonols. The total amount of phenolic compounds was the highest in both fruits and leaves in the samples from the Bursa province.

Identifiers

PMID38585047
PMCPMC10993410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.