Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38585026›Full record

ArticleBrain & NeuroRehabilitation2024

Intrathecal Baclofen Injection Efficacy for Spasticity Management in Patients With Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.

Ki Deok Park, Min-Keun Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & NeuroRehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ki Deok ParkDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1684-4737
Min-Keun SongDepartment of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-5345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although intrathecal baclofen injections have been used for spasticity management regarding stroke, spinal cord injury, and central nervous system diseases, their relative efficacy is controversial. This systematic review scoured 3 multinational electronic databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase) to isolate relevant studies. We analyzed non-randomized studies and randomized control trials (RCTs) with direct comparisons against other spasticity management interventions for adult stroke patients. Risk of Bias (RoB) and the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies evaluations were implemented with Cochrane's RoB tool. Meta-analysis was performed with Revman 5.4, and evidence validity was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations method. Lastly, the intrathecal baclofen injection meta-analysis included 2 RCTs and 7 non-RCTs for assessing spasticity and 4 non-RCTs to measure gait velocity. Based on this data, intrathecal baclofen injection significantly impacted spasticity and gait speed. Thus, intrathecal baclofen injection can potentially treat severe spasticity unresponsive to conventional spasticity therapy. Furthermore, clinicians must consider individual patient characteristics and conditions when contemplating intrathecal baclofen injection for spasticity intervention.

Indexed as

BaclofenIntrathecal InjectionMuscle SpasticityStroke

Identifiers

PMID38585026
PMCPMC10990847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.