Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38585005›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Prognostic utility of biopsy-based

Michael C Repka, Tamir Sholklapper, Alan L Zwart, Malika Danner, Marilyn Ayoob, Thomas Yung, Siyuan Lei, Brian T Collins, Deepak Kumar, Simeng Suy and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Exploring therapeutic applications ofFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michael C RepkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Tamir SholklapperDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Alan L ZwartDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Malika DannerDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Marilyn AyoobDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Thomas YungDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Siyuan LeiDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Brian T CollinsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States.
Deepak KumarJulius L Chambers Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States.
Simeng SuyDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Ryan A HankinsDepartment of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Amar U KishanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Health, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Sean P CollinsDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction/background: Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) genomic deletions and transmembrane protease, serine 2/v-ets avian erthyroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (ERG) rearrangements are two of the most common genetic abnormalities associated with prostate cancer. Prior studies have demonstrated these alterations portend worse clinical outcomes. Our objective is to evaluate the impact of biopsy-determined PTEN losses and TMPRSS2-ERG fusion on biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients who receive SBRT for localized prostate cancer. Methods/materials: Patients received SBRT for localized prostate cancer on a prospective quality-of-life (QoL) and cancer outcomes study. For each patient, the single biopsy core with the highest grade/volume of cancer was evaluated for PTEN and ERG abnormalities. Differences in baseline patient and disease characteristics between groups were analyzed using ANOVA for age and χ Results: Ninety-nine consecutive patients were included in the analysis with a median follow-up of 72 months. A statistically significant improvement in bPFS ( Conclusion: ERG rearrangements and PTEN deletions detected on biopsy samples are associated with poorer oncologic outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT and merit further study in a dedicated prospective trial.

Indexed as

ERGprostate cancerPTENradiotherapySBRT

Identifiers

PMID38585005
PMCPMC10995255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.