Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38584949›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Genomic prediction within and across maize landrace derived populations using haplotypes.

Yan-Cheng Lin, Manfred Mayer, Daniel Valle Torres, Torsten Pook, Armin C Hölker, Thomas Presterl, Milena Ouzunova, Chris-Carolin Schön

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genomic selection for seed yield enhances flax breeding efficiency.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2026
    Article
  2. Integrating multi-omics and machine learning for disease resistance prediction in legumes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  3. Rapid cycling genomic selection in maize landraces.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yan-Cheng LinChair of Plant Breeding, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Manfred MayerChair of Plant Breeding, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Daniel Valle TorresChair of Plant Breeding, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Torsten PookAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Armin C HölkerProduct Development Maize and Oil Crops, KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, Einbeck, Germany.
Thomas PresterlProduct Development Maize and Oil Crops, KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, Einbeck, Germany.
Milena OuzunovaProduct Development Maize and Oil Crops, KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, Einbeck, Germany.
Chris-Carolin SchönChair of Plant Breeding, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction (GP) using haplotypes is considered advantageous compared to GP solely reliant on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), owing to haplotypes' enhanced ability to capture ancestral information and their higher linkage disequilibrium with quantitative trait loci (QTL). Many empirical studies supported the advantages of haplotype-based GP over SNP-based approaches. Nevertheless, the performance of haplotype-based GP can vary significantly depending on multiple factors, including the traits being studied, the genetic structure of the population under investigation, and the particular method employed for haplotype construction. In this study, we compared haplotype and SNP based prediction accuracies in four populations derived from European maize landraces. Populations comprised either doubled haploid lines (DH) derived directly from landraces, or gamete capture lines (GC) derived from crosses of the landraces with an inbred line. For two different landraces, both types of populations were generated, genotyped with 600k SNPs and phenotyped as lines per se for five traits. Our study explores three prediction scenarios: (i) within each of the four populations, (ii) across DH and GC populations from the same landrace, and (iii) across landraces using either DH or GC populations. Three haplotype construction methods were evaluated: 1. fixed-window blocks (FixedHB), 2. LD-based blocks (HaploView), and 3. IBD-based blocks (HaploBlocker). In within population predictions, FixedHB and HaploView methods performed as well as or slightly better than SNPs for all traits. HaploBlocker improved accuracy for certain traits but exhibited inferior performance for others. In prediction across populations, the parameter setting from HaploBlocker which controls the construction of shared haplotypes between populations played a crucial role for obtaining optimal results. When predicting across landraces, accuracies were low for both, SNP and haplotype approaches, but for specific traits substantial improvement was observed with HaploBlocker. This study provides recommendations for optimal haplotype construction and identifies relevant parameters for constructing haplotypes in the context of genomic prediction.

Indexed as

across population predictiongenomic predictionhaplotype constructionlandracesparameter tuning

Identifiers

PMID38584949
PMCPMC10995330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.