Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38584890›Full record

ReviewJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2024

Augmented reality in brachytherapy: A narrative review.

Martina Ferioli, Federica Medici, Ludovica Forlani, Savino Cilla, Bruno Fionda, Silvia Cammelli, Lidia Strigari, Luca Tagliaferri, Alessio G Morganti, Milly Buwenge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Evaluation of augmented reality for interstitial brachytherapy optimisation: a prospective phantom-based study protocol and preliminary results.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Martina FerioliRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Federica MediciRadiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.
Ludovica ForlaniRadiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.
Savino CillaMedical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
Bruno FiondaFondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS; Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy.
Silvia CammelliRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lidia StrigariRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Luca TagliaferriFondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS; Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy.
Alessio G MorgantiRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Milly BuwengeRadiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brachytherapy (BRT) plays a pivotal role in the treatment of tumors, offering precise radiation therapy directly to the affected area. However, this technique demands extensive training and skills development, posing challenges for widespread adoption and ensuring patient safety. This narrative review explored the utilization of augmented reality (AR) in BRT, seeking to summarize existing evidence, discuss key findings, limitations, and quality of research as well as outline future research directions. The review revealed promising findings regarding the integration of AR in BRT. Studies have suggested the feasibility and potential benefits of AR in education, training, intra-operative guidance, and treatment planning. However, the evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, with most studies in preliminary phases. Standardization, prospective clinical trials, patient-centered outcomes assessment, and cost-effectiveness analysis emerge as critical areas for future research. Augmented reality holds transformative potential for BRT by enhancing precision, safety, and training efficiency. To fully implement these benefits, the field requires standardized protocols, rigorous clinical trials, and in-depth patient-centered investigations. Policy-makers and healthcare providers should closely monitor developments in AR and consider its implementation in clinical practice, contingent and robust evidence, and cost-effectiveness analysis. The pro-active pursuit of evidence-based practices will contribute to optimizing patient care in BRT.

Indexed as

augmented realitybrachytherapyliterature reviewmixed realitynarrative reviewtraining

Identifiers

PMID38584890
PMCPMC10993895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.