ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2024
Dosimetric comparison of intra-cavitary brachytherapy technique with free-hand (intra-cavitary + interstitial) technique in cervical cancer.
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Semi-Automated Robotic Platform for Curvilinear Catheter Implantation in HDR Prostate and GYN Brachytherapy.Journal of medical robotics research · 2026Article
- Precision brachytherapy for bulky cervical tumors: Clinical implementation of a 3D-printed template and curved needle system.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2025Article
- Personalized brachytherapy in gynecological cancers: procedural narrative in patients with a poor response or challenging anatomy after chemoradiation.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2025Article
- Article
- The significance of free-hand needles in cervical cancer brachytherapy.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to dosimetrically compare intra-cavitary brachytherapy technique (ICBT) with free-hand (intra-cavitary + interstitial, IC + IS) technique. Material and methods: Twenty seven locally advanced carcinoma cervix patients were included in the study. Patients with more than medial 1/3 Results: A total of 79 needles were applied. Using paired- Conclusions: Free-hand brachytherapy (IC + IS) achieves a statistically significant better dose distribution to high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) comparing with ICBT technique with similar dose to organs at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.