ReviewTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2024
Foreign body aspirations with rigid bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy in children.
Review in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hidden Esophageal Foreign Body Masquerading as Aberrant Innominate Artery in an Infant With Recurrent Stridor.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Pediatric Sharp Foreign Body Aspiration: Revealing Unexpected Risk Factors.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Advances in Understanding Recurrent Pulmonary Infections Following Foreign Body Aspiration: A Narrative Review.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foreign body aspirations and esophageal foreign bodies are lifethreatening conditions. Sometimes they or their complications can cause severe morbidity and even mortality. Their exact incidence is unknown. Foreign body aspirations and esophageal foreign bodies are most commonly observed in the pediatric age group. While interventions are generally required for the removal of respiratory tract foreign bodies, the majority of esophageal foreign bodies come out spontaneously. Removal of foreign bodies that block the lumen of the organ to a great extent, react with the mucosa such as battery magnets, and can cause poisoning, sharp-edged objects, and swellable foreign bodies such as legumes, should be done acutely. In the removal of foreign bodies, endoscopic methods (flexible/rigid bronchoscope) are used in the respiratory system. Other methods used in esophageal foreign bodies are follow-up and pushing and pulling maneuvers with equipment, and at times, open surgical procedures can be applied. The success of the procedures is high, and patients can be discharged in the early postoperative period. Their incidence can be decreased by raising awareness on the subject, parents can be prevented from making wrong applications in these cases, and clinicians can keep these conditions in mind in differential diagnosis. In this article, the clinical features and diagnosis and treatment methods of foreign body aspiration and esophageal foreign bodies will be discussed separately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.