Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38584766›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical artificial intelligence2024

Hybrid artificial intelligence outcome prediction using features extraction from stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance images and electronic health records.

Ebraham Alskaf, Richard Crawley, Cian M Scannell, Avan Suinesiaputra, Alistair Young, Pier-Giorgio Masci, Divaka Perera, Amedeo Chiribiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ebraham AlskafSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Richard CrawleySchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Cian M ScannellSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Avan SuinesiaputraSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Alistair YoungSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Pier-Giorgio MasciSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Divaka PereraSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Amedeo ChiribiriSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

The Cardiac Atlas ProjectR01HL121754 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MCCULLOCH, ANDREW D., OMENS, JEFFREY H. · 2014 to 2023
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121754Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prediction of clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease (CAD) has been conventionally achieved using clinical risk factors. The relationship between imaging features and outcome is still not well understood. This study aims to use artificial intelligence to link image features with mortality outcome. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on patients who had stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (SP-CMR) between 2011 and 2021. The endpoint was all-cause mortality. Convolutional neural network (CNN) was used to extract features from stress perfusion images, and multilayer perceptron (MLP) to extract features from electronic health records (EHRs), both networks were concatenated in a hybrid neural network (HNN) to predict study endpoint. Image CNN was trained to predict study endpoint directly from images. HNN and image CNN were compared with a linear clinical model using area under the curve (AUC), F1 scores, and McNemar's test. Results: Total of 1,286 cases were identified, with 201 death events (16%). The clinical model had good performance (AUC =80%, F1 score =37%). Best Image CNN model showed AUC =72% and F1 score =38%. HNN outperformed the other two models (AUC =82%, F1 score =43%). McNemar's test showed statistical difference between image CNN and both clinical model (P<0.01) and HNN (P<0.01). There was no significant difference between HNN and clinical model (P=0.15). Conclusions: Death in patients with suspected or known CAD can be predicted directly from stress perfusion images without clinical knowledge. Prediction can be improved by HNN that combines clinical and SP-CMR images.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)coronary artery disease (CAD)electronic health records (EHRs)outcome prediction

Identifiers

PMID38584766
PMCPMC7615812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.