Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38584344›Full record

ArticleDrug testing and analysis2025

Plasma drug screening using paper spray mass spectrometry with integrated solid phase extraction.

Hannah Zimmerman-Federle, Greta Ren, Sarah Dowling, Cassandra Warren, Daniel Rusyniak, Robert Avera, Nicholas E Manicke

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hannah Zimmerman-FederleDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Greta RenDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Sarah DowlingDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Cassandra WarrenDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Daniel RusyniakSchool of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Robert AveraSchool of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Nicholas E ManickeDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-0497

Funding

All-in-one Device for Forensic Toxicology Drug ScreeningR44DA056319 · NIDA · WIK DEVICES, LLC · PI WISEMAN, JUSTIN MICHAEL · 2022 to 2024
$2.0M
Sensitive and Rapid Screening of Synthetic Drugs by Mass SpectrometryR21DA043037 · NIDA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MANICKE, NICHOLAS E · 2017 to 2018
$411k
Indiana University's Responding to the Addictions Crisis Grand Challenges initiativeNational Institutes of Health (NIH) 5R44DA056319National Institutes of Health (NIH) R21DA043037NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA043037NIDA NIH HHS R44 DA056319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug overdoses have risen dramatically in recent years. We developed a simple nontargeted method using a disposable paper spray cartridge with an integrated solid phase extraction column. This method was used to screen for ~160 fentanyl analogs, synthetic cannabinoids, other synthetic drugs, and traditional drugs of abuse in over 300 authentic overdose samples collected at emergency departments in Indianapolis. A solid phase extraction step was implemented on the paper spray cartridge to enable subnanograms per milliliter synthetic drugs screening in plasma. Analysis was performed on a quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer using the sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra approach in which tandem mass spectrometry was performed using 7 m/z isolation windows in the quadrupole. Calibration curves with isotopically labeled internal standards were constructed for 35 of the most frequently encountered synthetic and traditional illicit drugs by US toxicology labs. Additional qualitative-only drugs in a suspect screening list were also included. Limits of detection in plasma for synthetic cannabinoids ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 and 0.1 to 0.3 ng/mL for fentanyl and its analogs and between 1 and 5 ng/mL for most other drugs. Relative matrix effects were evaluated by determining the variation of the calibration slope in 10 different lots of biofluid and found to be between 3% and 20%. The method was validated on authentic overdose samples collected from two emergency departments in Indianapolis, Indiana, from suspected or known overdoses. Commonly detected synthetic drugs included fentanyl related substances, designer benzodiazepines such as flubromazolam, and the synthetic cannabinoid 5F-PB-22.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsSolid Phase ExtractionSubstance Abuse DetectionTandem Mass SpectrometryCannabinoidsDrug OverdoseFentanylHumansLimit of DetectionPaperCannabinoidsFentanylIllicit Drugs3D printingambient ionizationhigh resolutionmethamphetamineopiates

Identifiers

PMID38584344
PMCPMC11729250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.