Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38584259›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

The efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block for reducing pain and opioid consumption after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chunjie She, Hefeng Liu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07109388 (Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07109388 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block With a Combined Femoral, Sciatic, Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Secondary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisRan2025 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsHip Arthroplasty Replacement, Post Operative Analgesia, Post Operative Pain, AcuteArmsPericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with 0.75% ropivacaine guided by ultrasound, Femoral, sciatic and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block with 0.375% ropivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pericapsular nerve group block for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chunjie SheDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chaohu Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Chaohu, Anhui, China.
Hefeng LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chaohu Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Chaohu, Anhui, China. liuhefeng111@163.com.
Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPericapsular nerve group block (PENG) is an emerging regional anesthesia technique for hip surgery. However, its efficacy in total hip arthroplasty (THA) isn't well defined. We perform this meta-analysis aiming to assess the effect of Pericapsular nerve group block on pain control and morphine consumption in patients with total hip arthroplasty.

methodsWe searched four electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science dated from 2018 to October 2023) for published eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PENG with placebo (no block/sham block) after THA. The outcome measurements consisted of pain score, opioid consumption, Time to first opioid, and postoperative complications. All data analyses were performed using STATA 12.0.

resultsFive RCTs comprising 808 participants were included. Our meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences between two groups in terms of pain score in PACU (WMD =  - 0.598, 95% CI [- 0.886, - 0.310], P < 0.001), pain score at 6 h (WMD =  - 0.614, 95% CI [- 0.835, - 0.392], P < 0.001) and time to first opioid (WMD = 5.214, 95% CI [4.545, 5.883], P < 0.001). However, no significant differences were revealed from the pain score at 24 h after THA (WMD =  - 0.924, 95% CI [- 1.929, 0.081], P = 0.072). Meanwhile, the meta-analysis indicated that PENG significantly reduced 24-h opioid consumption (WMD =  - 6.168, 95% CI [- 6.667, - 5.668], P < 0.001) and 48-h opioid consumption (WMD =  - 7.171, 95% CI [- 8.994, - 5.348], P < 0.001).

conclusionPericapsular nerve group block was effective for pain control up to postoperative 6 h and extending the time to the first opioid after THA. Moreover, it reduced postoperative opioid consumption when compared with a placebo group. Due to the high heterogeneity of the pain score after 24 h and the low-quality evidence, more high-quality RCTs are required to draw a definitive conclusion about pain control.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipNerve BlockAnalgesics, OpioidFemoral NerveHumansPostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidOpioidPainPericapsular nerve group blockTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID38584259
PMCPMC11000340
OpenAlexW4394574582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.