Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38584244›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Tissue response following implantation with the posterior dynamic distraction device (PDDD) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Olivia Kristina Richard, Aléthéa Liens, DesiRae Muirhead, Klaus Weber

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04296903 (Post-approval Registry Study to Evaluate the Continued Safety and Probable Benefit of the MID-C System for 5 Years Post-Implantation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04296903 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Post-approval Registry Study to Evaluate the Continued Safety and Probable Benefit of the MID-C System for 5 Years Post-Implantation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorApifixRan2020 to 2030Enrolled201ConditionsAdolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisArmsMID-C System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Clinical outcomes and complications of the posterior dynamic distraction device in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olivia Kristina RichardAnaPath Services GmbH, Liestal, Switzerland.
Aléthéa LiensAnaPath Services GmbH, Liestal, Switzerland.
DesiRae MuirheadSanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD, 57108, USA.
Klaus WeberAnaPath Services GmbH, Liestal, Switzerland. kweber@anapath.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-9356-3480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe PDDD is a ratchet-based, unidirectional expandable rod to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), primarily by correcting scoliotic deformity without full spinal fusion. We hypothesized that the device will be fully tolerated by the host and, if aseptic screw loosening occurs, it will be unrelated to wear particle formation.

methodsThis study comprised tissue samples from seven patients from a prospective study (NCT04296903) to assess the PDDD's safety and benefits, reoperated due to complications. Host response was assessed from histological slides (four levels/implant) in accordance with GLP and ISO10993-6:2016. The elementary chemical composition of wear particles present in tissue sections was quantified by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX).

resultsHost reaction was minor, characterized by low levels of diverse inflammatory cells, mild fibrosis, occasional small necrotic foci, neovascularization, hemorrhage, and, rarely, small bone fragments. Twenty-four of 28 tissue sections displayed varying degrees of wear particles (black discoloration), and most sections (17) were scored as 1 (< 25% of the sample). The discoloration observed corresponded to black-appearing, fine granular pigment. EDX analysis confirmed particles were composed of titanium, aluminum, and vanadium. Twenty-six of 28 samples were scored zero for necrosis and 2/28 were scored 1. Eleven samples were scored zero for fibrosis, 12 as 1, and five as 2. No aseptic screw loosening occurred.

conclusionThe PDDD induced minimal host reaction with little or no degeneration, inflammation or fibrosis. No changes present could be expected to promote device failure. The PDDD implant for treating AIS is well-tolerated and locally safe.

Indexed as

ScoliosisAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)ApiFixNon-fusionPosterior dynamic distraction device (PDDD)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.