Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38584239›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2024

Is Risk-Stratifying Patients with Colorectal Cancer Using a Deep Learning-Based Prognostic Biomarker Cost-Effective?

Anna Kenseth, Dominika Kantorova, Mikyung Kelly Seo, Eline Aas, John Cairns, David Kerr, Hanne Askautrud, Jørn Evert Jacobsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna Kenseth *Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Dominika Kantorova *Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mikyung Kelly SeoDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. ks2024@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4746-2264
Eline AasDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society,, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
John CairnsDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
David KerrRadcliffe Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Hanne AskautrudInstitute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jørn Evert JacobsenInstitute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Norwegian Research Council the Bench to Bedside Project (309610)Norwegian Research Council the DoMore Project (259204)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAccurate risk stratification of patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC) prior to treatment selection enables limited health resources to be efficiently allocated to patients who are likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a recently developed deep learning-based prognostic method, Histotyping, from the perspective of the Norwegian healthcare system.

methodsTwo partitioned survival models were developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of Histotyping for two treatment cohorts: patients with CRC stage II and III. For each of the two cohorts, Histotyping was used for risk stratification to assign adjuvant chemotherapy and was compared with the standard of care (SOC) (adjuvant chemotherapy to all patients). Health outcomes measured in the model were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the impact of uncertainty. Scenario analyses were performed to assess the impact of the parameters with the greatest uncertainty.

resultsRisk-stratifying patients with CRC stage II and III using Histotyping was dominant (less costly and more effective) compared to SOC. In patients with CRC stage II, the net monetary benefit of Histotyping was 270,934 Norwegian kroners (NOK) (year of valuation is 2021), and the net health benefit of Histotyping was 0.99. In stage III, the net monetary benefit of Histotyping was 195,419 NOK, and the net health benefit of Histotyping was 0.71.

conclusionsRisk-stratifying patients with CRC using Histotyping prior to the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is likely to be a cost-effective strategy in Norway.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisDeep LearningQuality-Adjusted Life YearsBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingNorwayPrognosisRisk AssessmentBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.