Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38584094›Full record

ArticleJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B2024

Large-scale genome-wide SNP analysis reveals the rugged (and ragged) landscape of global ancestry, phylogeny, and demographic history in chicken breeds.

Natalia V Dementieva, Yuri S Shcherbakov, Olga I Stanishevskaya, Anatoly B Vakhrameev, Tatiana A Larkina, Artem P Dysin, Olga A Nikolaeva, Anna E Ryabova, Anastasiia I Azovtseva, Olga V Mitrofanova and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome-Wide Association Studies in Japanese Quails of the FInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Natalia V DementievaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding ‒ Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196601, Russia. dementevan@mail.ru.
Yuri S ShcherbakovRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding ‒ Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196601, Russia.
Olga I StanishevskayaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding ‒ Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196601, Russia.
Anatoly B VakhrameevRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding ‒ Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196601, Russia.
Tatiana A LarkinaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding ‒ Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196601, Russia.
Artem P DysinRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding ‒ Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196601, Russia.
Olga A NikolaevaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding ‒ Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196601, Russia.
Anna E RyabovaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding ‒ Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196601, Russia.
Anastasiia I AzovtsevaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding ‒ Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196601, Russia.
Olga V MitrofanovaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding ‒ Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196601, Russia.
Grigoriy K PeglivanyanRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding ‒ Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196601, Russia.
Natalia R ReinbachRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding ‒ Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196601, Russia.
Darren K GriffinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NJ, UK. dementevan@mail.ru, Griffin@kent.ac.uk.
Michael N RomanovSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NJ, UK. dementevan@mail.ru, m.romanov@kent.ac.uk.

Funding

the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-15-2021-1037 and Internal 15.BRK.21.0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The worldwide chicken gene pool encompasses a remarkable, but shrinking, number of divergently selected breeds of diverse origin. This study was a large-scale genome-wide analysis of the landscape of the complex molecular architecture, genetic variability, and detailed structure among 49 populations. These populations represent a significant sample of the world's chicken breeds from Europe (Russia, Czech Republic, France, Spain, UK, etc.), Asia (China), North America (USA), and Oceania (Australia). Based on the results of breed genotyping using the Illumina 60K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip, a bioinformatic analysis was carried out. This included the calculation of heterozygosity/homozygosity statistics, inbreeding coefficients, and effective population size. It also included assessment of linkage disequilibrium and construction of phylogenetic trees. Using multidimensional scaling, principal component analysis, and ADMIXTURE-assisted global ancestry analysis, we explored the genetic structure of populations and subpopulations in each breed. An overall 49-population phylogeny analysis was also performed, and a refined evolutionary model of chicken breed formation was proposed, which included egg, meat, dual-purpose types, and ambiguous breeds. Such a large-scale survey of genetic resources in poultry farming using modern genomic methods is of great interest both from the viewpoint of a general understanding of the genetics of the domestic chicken and for the further development of genomic technologies and approaches in poultry breeding. In general, whole genome SNP genotyping of promising chicken breeds from the worldwide gene pool will promote the further development of modern genomic science as applied to poultry.

Indexed as

ChickensGenomeAnimalsDemographyGenetic VariationGenomicsPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideChicken genome diversityDemographic historyGene poolGlobal ancestryPhylogenySingle nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis

Identifiers

PMID38584094
PMCPMC11009443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.