Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38584002›Full record

ReviewNMR in biomedicine2024

Understanding central nervous system fluid networks: Historical perspectives and a revised model for clinical neurofluid imaging.

Rupal I Mehta, Rashi I Mehta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NMR in biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Arachnoid granulation morphologies and β-amyloid and tau pathology in older adults.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rupal I MehtaDepartment of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4917-6907
Rashi I MehtaDepartment of Neuroradiology, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2532-7435

Funding

Mapping the perivascular reticular network in health, aging, and ADRF1AG083765 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Rupal I. Mehta · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
Arachnoid Granulation Senescence in Aging, CAA and Alzheimer's DiseaseR21AG079221 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MEHTA, RUPAL I. · 2022 to 2022
$435k
Alzheimer's Association AARGD-22-973935NIA NIH HHS R21 AG079221NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG083765NIH HHS R01AG083765NIH HHS R21AG079221RADC Development Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central nervous system (CNS) lacks traditionally defined lymphatic vasculature. However, CNS tissues and barriers compartmentalize the brain, spinal cord, and adjacent spaces, facilitating the transmittal of fluids, metabolic wastes, immune cells, and vital signals, while more conventional lymphatic pathways in the meninges, cervicofacial and paraspinal regions transmit efflux fluid and molecules to peripheral lymph and lymph nodes. Thus, a unique and highly organized fluid circulation network encompassing intraparenchymal, subarachnoid, dural, and extradural segments functions in unison to maintain CNS homeostasis. Pathways involved in this system have been under investigation for centuries and continue to be the source of considerable interest and debate. Modern imaging and microscopy technologies have led to important breakthroughs pertaining to various elements of CNS fluid circuitry and exchange over the past decade, thus enhancing knowledge on mechanisms of mammalian CNS maintenance and disease. Yet, to better understand precise anatomical routes, the physiology and clinical significance of these CNS pathways, and potential therapeutic targets in humans, fluid conduits, flow-regulating factors, and tissue effects must be analyzed systematically and in a global manner in persons across age, demographical factors, and disease states. Here, we illustrate the system-wide nature of intermixing CNS fluid networks, summarize historical and clinical studies, and discuss anatomical and physiological similarities and differences that are relevant for translation of evidence from mice to humans. We also review Cushing's classical model of cerebrospinal fluid flow and present a new framework of this "third circulation" that emphasizes previously unexplained complexities of CNS fluid circulation in humans. Finally, we review future directions in the field, including emerging theranostic techniques and MRI studies required in humans.

Indexed as

Central Nervous SystemAnimalsHistory, 20th CenturyHumanscerebrospinal fluidCNS fluid networksinterstitial fluidin vivo imagingmeningeal lymphatic systemMRI

Identifiers

PMID38584002
PMCPMC11531858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.