Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38583940›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2024

The impact of adjusting for hysterectomy prevalence on cervical cancer incidence rates and trends among women aged 30 years or older-United States, 2001-2019.

Sameer V Gopalani, George F Sawaya, Anne F Rositch, Sabitha Dasari, Trevor D Thompson, Jacqueline M Mix, Mona Saraiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sameer V GopalaniDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States.
George F SawayaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Anne F RositchHealth Outcomes and Real-World Evidence, Hologic, Inc, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Sabitha DasariCyberdata Technologies, Inc., Herndon, VA 20170, United States.
Trevor D ThompsonDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States.
Jacqueline M MixDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States.
Mona SaraiyaDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hysterectomy protects against cervical cancer when the cervix is removed. However, measures of cervical cancer incidence often fail to exclude women with a hysterectomy from the population-at-risk denominator, underestimating and distorting disease burden. In this study, we estimated hysterectomy prevalence from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys to remove the women who were not at risk of cervical cancer from the denominator and combined these estimates with the US Cancer Statistics data. From these data, we calculated age-specific and age-standardized incidence rates for women aged >30 years from 2001-2019, adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence. We calculated the difference between unadjusted and adjusted incidence rates and examined trends by histology, age, race and ethnicity, and geographic region using joinpoint regression. The hysterectomy-adjusted cervical cancer incidence rate from 2001-2019 was 16.7 per 100 000 women-34.6% higher than the unadjusted rate. After adjustment, incidence rates were higher by approximately 55% among Black women, 56% among those living in the East South Central division, and 90% among women aged 70-79 and ≥80 years. These findings underscore the importance of adjusting for hysterectomy prevalence to avoid underestimating cervical cancer incidence rates and masking disparities by age, race, and geographic region. This article is part of a Special Collection on Gynecological Cancers.

Indexed as

HysterectomyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedPrevalenceUnited Statescancer disparitiescervical cancerdenominatorhysterectomyincidence rateincidence trends

Identifiers

PMID38583940
PMCPMC12053814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.