Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38583604›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2024

Perception and reality: The mismatch between absolute and relative physical activity intensity during pregnancy and postpartum in United States women.

Kathryn R Hesketh, Fang Wen, Amy H Herring, Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Kelly R Evenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathryn R HeskethDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: krh40@cam.ac.uk.
Fang WenDepartment of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Amy H HerringDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Anna Maria Siega-RizDepartments of Nutrition and Biostatistics & Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA.
Kelly R EvensonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

Science CoreP2CHD065563 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI James Moody · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
Understanding Change in Physical Activity PostpartumR01CA109804 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EVENSON, KELLY R. · 2004 to 2009
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109804NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065563NIH HHS CA109804-01NIH HHS DK 061981-02NIH HHS HD37584Wellcome Trust 107337/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore whether a mismatch between absolute physical activity intensity (PAI) and relative self-reported PAI exists during pregnancy and postpartum.

methodsWomen from the PIN3/Postpartum study completed physical activity questionnaires during pregnancy (n = 770; Trimester 2: T2, Trimester 3: T3) and postpartum (n = 181; 3 months: PP3, 12 months PP12) (2001-2005). Activities women engaged in were assigned Metabolic Equivalent (MET) values for absolute intensity; women self-reported perceived exertion (using the Borg scale) for each activity to provide relative intensity. Hierarchical regression models were used to determine whether a mismatch between absolute and relative PAI (for moderate or vigorous physical activity (MPA; VPA)) differed during pregnancy and postpartum. Models were adjusted for socio-demographic factors.

resultsWomen commonly overestimated the amount of MPA and VPA they engaged in [T2 MPA mean 60.5 min/week (49.1, 72.0), VPA 3.7 (-1.4, 8.8); T3: MPA 47.7 (38.9, 56.4), 2.9 (-1.7, 7.4); PP3: MPA 69.5 (43.9, 95.1), VPA 15.8 (1.8, 29.7); PP12: MPA 42.20 (26.8, 57.6), VPA 2.75 (-7.8, 12.9)]. Women overestimated both MPA and VPA to a lesser extent at T3 compared to T2 (MPA: β for difference:-12.6 [95%CI: -26.0, -0.9]; VPA: -0.9 [-6.4, 4.6]). Women continued to overestimate their MPA at PP3 and PP12.

conclusionsCompared to absolute PAI, perceived PAI was greater for MPA compared to VPA and differences persisted from pregnancy through postpartum. Future research should focus on how perceptions relate to women's actual physiological capacity and whether this mismatch influences the amount of physical activity women engage in during the transition to motherhood.

Indexed as

ExercisePerceptionPostpartum PeriodAdultFemaleHumansPhysical ExertionPregnancySelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesIntensityPerceptionPhysical activityPostpartumPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38583604
PMCPMC11079917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.