Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38583473›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

A nature-positive future with biological invasions: theory, decision support and research needs.

Melodie A McGeoch, David A Clarke, Ninad Avinash Mungi, Alejandro Ordonez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reconsidering the role of introduced species in the climate-affected and highly invaded eastern Mediterranean.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Navigating ecological novelty towards planetary stewardship: challenges and opportunities in biodiversity dynamics in a transforming biosphere.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melodie A McGeochSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3388-2241
David A ClarkeSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Victoria, Australia.
Ninad Avinash MungiSection of Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark.
Alejandro OrdonezSection of Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2873-4551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2050, most areas of biodiversity significance will be heavily influenced by multiple drivers of environmental change. This includes overlap with the introduced ranges of many alien species that negatively impact biodiversity. With the decline in biodiversity and increase in all forms of global change, the need to envision the desired qualities of natural systems in the Anthropocene is growing, as is the need to actively maintain their natural values. Here, we draw on community ecology and invasion biology to (i) better understand trajectories of change in communities with a mix of native and alien populations, and (ii) to frame approaches to the stewardship of these mixed-species communities. We provide a set of premises and actions upon which a nature-positive future with biological invasions (NPF-BI) could be based, and a decision framework for dealing with uncertain species movements under climate change. A series of alternative management approaches become apparent when framed by scale-sensitive, spatially explicit, context relevant and risk-consequence considerations. Evidence of the properties of mixed-species communities together with predictive frameworks for the relative importance of the ecological processes at play provide actionable pathways to a NPF in which the reality of mixed-species communities are accommodated and managed. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ecological novelty and planetary stewardship: biodiversity dynamics in a transforming biosphere'.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemClimate ChangeDecision TheoryIntroduced Speciesadaptive managementcommunity ecologyglobal biodiversity frameworknovel ecosystemsprioritizationspecies movement

Identifiers

PMID38583473
PMCPMC10999266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.