Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38583422›Full record

ArticleOncology research and treatment2024

Intradermal Naked DNA Vaccination by DNA Tattooing for Mounting Tumor-Specific Immunity in Stage IV Melanoma Patients: A Phase I Clinical Trial.

Marnix H Geukes Foppen, Maartje W Rohaan, Jessica S W Borgers, Daisy Philips, Florry Vyth-Dreese, Jos H Beijnen, Bastiaan Nuijen, Joost H van den Berg, John B A G Haanen

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marnix H Geukes FoppenNetherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maartje W RohaanNetherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, m.rohaan@nki.nl.
Jessica S W BorgersNetherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daisy PhilipsNetherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Florry Vyth-DreeseNetherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos H BeijnenNetherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bastiaan NuijenNetherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost H van den BergNetherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
John B A G HaanenNetherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNaked DNA vaccination could be a powerful and safe strategy to mount antigen-specific cellular immunity. We designed a phase I clinical trial to investigate the toxicity of naked DNA vaccines encoding CD8+ T-cell epitope from tumor-associated antigen MART-1 in patients with advanced melanoma.

methodsThis dose escalating phase Ia clinical trial investigates the toxicity and immunological response upon naked DNA vaccines encoding a CD8+ T-cell epitope from the tumor-associated antigen MART-1, genetically linked to the gene encoding domain 1 of subunit-tetanus toxin fragment C in patients with advanced melanoma (inoperable stage IIIC-IV, AJCC 7th edition). The vaccine was administrated via intradermal application using a permanent make-up or tattoo device. Safety was monitored according to CTCAE v.3.0 and skin biopsies and blood samples were obtained for immunologic monitoring.

resultsNine pretreated, HLA-A*0201-positive patients with advanced melanoma expressing MART-1 and MHC class I, with a good performance status, and adequate organ function, were included. With a median follow-up of 5.9 months, DNA vaccination was safe, without treatment-related deaths. Common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were dermatologic reactions at the vaccination site (100%) and pain (56%). One patient experienced grade 4 toxicity, most likely related to tumor progression. One patient (11%) achieved stable disease, lasting 353 days. Immune analysis showed no increase in vaccine-induced T cell response in peripheral blood of 5 patients, but did show a MART-1 specific CD8+ T cell response at the tattoo administration site. The maximum dose administered was 2 mg due to lack of clinical activity.

conclusionWe showed that the developed DNA vaccine, applied using a novel intradermal application strategy, can be administered safely. Further research with improved vaccine formats is required to show possible clinical benefit of DNA vaccination.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesMelanomaNeoplasm StagingTattooingVaccines, DNAAdultAgedCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFemaleHLA-A2 AntigenHumansInjections, IntradermalMaleMART-1 AntigenMiddle AgedCancer VaccinesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHLA-A*02:01 antigenHLA-A2 AntigenMART-1 AntigenVaccines, DNAAdvanced melanomaDNA vaccinationImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38583422
PMCPMC11323828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.