Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38583214›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology2024

Robotic beyond total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancers: Perioperative and oncological outcomes from a multicentre case series.

Jim S Khan, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Philippe Rouanet, Avanish Saklani, Volkan Ozben, Paul Neary, Peter Coyne, Seon Hahn Kim, Julio Garcia-Aguilar

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Robotic Beyond Total Mesorectal Excision With Synchronous Perineal Flap Reconstruction: Feasibility and Early Outcomes.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jim S KhanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK; University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK. Electronic address: jim.khan@porthosp.nhs.uk.
Guglielmo Niccolò PiozziDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK. Electronic address: guglielmopiozzi@gmail.com.
Philippe RouanetDepartment of Surgery, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. Electronic address: philippe.rouanet@icm.unicancer.fr.
Avanish SaklaniDivision of Colorectal Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: asaklani@hotmail.com.
Volkan OzbenDepartment of General Surgery, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Acibadem Atakent Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: volkanozben@yahoo.co.uk.
Paul NearyDivision of Colorectal Surgery, The Adelaide and Meath Hospital Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: paulcneary1@gmail.com.
Peter CoyneDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK. Electronic address: peter.coyne1@nhs.net.
Seon Hahn KimDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: drkimsh@gmail.com.
Julio Garcia-AguilarColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA. Electronic address: garciaaj@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAround 20% of rectal tumors are locally advanced with invasion into adjacent structures at presentation. These may require surgical resections beyond boundaries of total mesorectal excision (bTME) for radicality. Robotic bTME is under investigation. This study reports perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic bTME for locally advanced rectal cancers. MATERIALS AND

methodsA multicentre, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected robotic bTME resections (July 2015-November 2020). Demographics, clinicopathological features, short-term outcomes, recurrences, and survival were investigated.

resultsOne-hundred-sixty-eight patients (eight centres) were included. Median age and BMI were 60.0 (50.0-68.7) years and 24.0 (24.4-27.7) kg/m

conclusionRobotic bTME is technically safe with relatively low conversion rate, good OS, and acceptable DFS in the hands of experienced surgeons in high volume centres. In selected cases robotic approach allows for high R0 rates during bTME.

Indexed as

Operative TimeRectal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantConversion to Open SurgeryDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsProctectomybeyond TMECase seriesMulti-visceral resectionPelvic exenterationRectal cancerRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38583214
PMCPMC11702198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.