ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular interventions2024
Visual Estimates of Coronary Slow Flow Are Not Associated With Invasive Wire-Based Diagnoses of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03537586 (A Single Center Diagnostic, Cross-sectional Study of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single Center Diagnostic, Cross-sectional Study of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Angiography-derived assessment of coronary microcirculatory resistance in patients with chronic total occlusion.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Coronary slow flow phenomenon: a meta-analysis of clinical risk predictors.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Angiography-Derived Versus Coronary Guidewire-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Ischemia With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Value of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, myocardial perfusion index, and global longitudinal strain derived from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in predicting coronary slow flow in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Response by Smilowitz et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Visual Estimates of Coronary Slow Flow Are Not Associated With Invasive Wire-Based Diagnoses of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction".Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2024Article
- Endothelial microRNAs in INOCA patients with diabetes mellitus.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Article
- Epicardial fat volume is associated with primary coronary slow-flow phenomenon in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter valve implantation.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary slow flow (CSF) by invasive coronary angiography is frequently understood to be an indicator of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in patients with ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries. However, the relationship between visual estimates of CSF and quantitative wire-based invasive diagnosis of CMD is uncertain.
methodsWe prospectively enrolled adults aged ≥18 years with stable ischemic heart disease who were referred for invasive coronary angiography. Individuals with ≥50% epicardial coronary artery stenosis were excluded. Invasive coronary angiography was reviewed for CSF, defined as ≥3 cardiac cycles to opacify distal vessels with contrast. Coronary function testing was performed in the left anterior descending coronary artery using bolus coronary thermodilution techniques to measure coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). Invasively determined CMD was defined as abnormal CFR (<2.5), abnormal IMR (≥25), or both.
resultsAmong 104 participants, the median age was 61.5 years and 79% were female. The median CFR was 3.6 (interquartile range, 2.5-4.7) and the median IMR was 21 (interquartile range, 13.3-28.0). Overall, 24.0% of participants had abnormal CFR, 34.6% had abnormal IMR, and 48.1% had a final diagnosis of invasively determined CMD. CSF was present in 23 participants (22.1%). The proportions of patients with CMD (56.5% versus 45.7%;
conclusionsAmong patients with ischemia with nonobstructive coronary artery, CSF was not associated with abnormal CFR, IMR, or either abnormal CFR or IMR. CSF is not a reliable angiographic surrogate of abnormal CFR or IMR as determined by invasive, wire-based physiology testing. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03537586.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.