ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2024
Trends in Oral Anticoagulant Use and Individual Expenditures Across the United States from 2014 to 2020.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in the use of vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants and impact on the incidence of oral anticoagulation-related intracerebral hemorrhage: population-wide prescription patterns in two 5-year cohorts.Annals of medicine · 2026Observational
- Nationwide Trends in Gastrointestinal Bleeding Mortality Before and After the Widespread Adoption of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the United States, 2007-2020.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Exploring the knowledge level and practices of hospital pharmacists in management of oral anticoagulants in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: a scoping review of literature.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Opioid-Free Pain Management Strategies for Patients on Oral Anticoagulation Undergoing Soft Tissue Hand Surgery.The Journal of hand surgery · 2025Review
- Trends and Hot Spots in Research Related to Rivaroxaban: Bibliometric Analysis.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Warfarin Treatment is Associated With Lower Postmortem Brain Vitamin K Concentrations in Older Adults.The Journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Prune extract prevents disuse osteoporosis by inhibiting the decrease in osteoblast-related gene expression in sciatic-denervated rats.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2025Article
- Application of a Novel UPLC-MS/MS Method for Analysis of Rivaroxaban Concentrations in Dried Blood Spot and Plasma Samples Collected from Patients with Venous Thrombosis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLandmark clinical trials have expended the indications for the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but contemporary data on usage and expenditure patterns are lacking.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess annual trends in oral anticoagulant (OAC) utilization and expenditure across the United States (US) from 2014 to 2020.
methodsWe utilized the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to study the trends of use and expenditures of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban between 2014 and 2020 in the US. Survey respondents reported OAC use within the past year, which was verified against pharmacy records. Payment information was obtained from the respondent's pharmacy and was categorized as third-party or self/out-of-pocket. Potential indications and medical conditions of interest for OAC therapy were identified from respondent-reported medical conditions. We estimated the national number of OAC users and total expenditures across age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, and medical condition subgroups. Trends of OAC users' characteristics, expenditure, and number of prescriptions were evaluated using the Mann-Kendall test for trends.
resultsBetween 2014 and 2020, the number of warfarin users decreased from 3.8 million (70% of all OAC users) to 2.2 million (p = 0.007) [29% of all OAC users], while the number of DOAC users increased from 1.6 million (30% of all OAC users) to 5.4 million (p = 0.003) [70% of all OAC users]. The total expenditure of OACs in the US increased from $3.4 billion in 2014 to $17.8 billion in 2020 (p = 0.003), which was driven by the increase in DOAC expenditures (p = 0.003).
conclusionsDOACs have replaced warfarin as the preferred OAC in the US. The increased costs associated with DOAC use may decline when generic formulations are approved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.