Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38583098›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2024

A novel scoring system for early prediction of massive transfusion requirement in trauma patients.

Leila Kasraian, Nima Naderi, Maryam Hosseini, Ali Taheri Akerdi, Shahram Paydar, Hossein Abdolrahimzadeh Fard

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leila KasraianBlood Transfusion Research Centre, Higher Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion Medicine, Shiraz, Iran.
Nima NaderiAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Maryam HosseiniTruama Research Center, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2357-0690
Ali Taheri AkerdiTruama Research Center, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shahram PaydarTruama Research Center, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hossein Abdolrahimzadeh FardTruama Research Center, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Dr.h.a.fard@gmail.com.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRHigh Institute for Education and Research in Transfusion Medicine · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early resuscitation using blood products is critical for patients with severe hemorrhagic shock. We aimed to develop and validate a new scoring system, hemorrhagic shock transfusion prediction (HSTP) score, to predict the need for massive transfusion (MT) in these patients, compared to the widely used Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) score. Trauma patients admitted to Emtiaz Hospital in Iran from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively included. Patients assigned a code 1 or 2 according to the Emergency severity index (ESI) triage system have been divided into MT and non-MT groups. MT was defined as receiving ≥ 10 units of packed cells (PCs) in 24 h. Demographic information, admission vital signs, and lab results available within 15 min were compared between the groups. A new predictive score was developed using logistic regression of statistically significant parameters. Out of 1029 patients, 651 (63.3%) required MT. An arrival, diastolic blood pressure < 79.5 mm Hg, absolute lymphocyte count > 1850/μL, base excess < - 4.25, and blood glucose > 156 mg/dL were independent predictors included in the HSTP score. The sensitivity and specificity were 74.36% and 53.87% for the HSTP score, compared to 31.03% and 76.16% for the ABC score. Moreover, the positive and negative predictive values were 77.88% and 49.03% for the HSTP score, versus 74.15% and 33.66% for ABC. The new scoring system demonstrated higher sensitivity and improved positive and negative predictive values compared to the ABC score. This score can assist physicians in making accurate transfusion decisions quickly, but further prospective studies are warranted to validate its clinical utility.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionWounds and InjuriesAdultFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesShock, HemorrhagicTriageBlood transfusionHemorrhage shockMassive transfusionScoring systemTrauma

Identifiers

PMID38583098
OpenAlexW4394063447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.