ArticleBiophysical journal2024
How much does TRPV1 deviate from an ideal MWC-type protein?
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Null method to estimate the maximal PA at subsaturating concentrations of agonist.The Journal of general physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Many ion channels are known to behave as an allosteric protein, coupling environmental stimuli captured by specialized sensing domains to the opening of a central pore. The classic Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) model, originally proposed to describe binding of gas molecules to hemoglobin, has been widely used as a framework for analyzing ion channel gating. Here, we address the issue of how accurately the MWC model predicts activation of the capsaicin receptor TRPV1 by vanilloids. Taking advantage of a concatemeric design that makes it possible to lock TRPV1 in states with zero to four bound vanilloid molecules, we showed quantitatively that the overall gating behavior is satisfactorily predicted by the MWC model. There is, however, a small yet detectable subunit position effect: ligand binding to two kitty-corner subunits is 0.3-0.4 kcal/mol more effective in inducing opening than binding to two neighbor subunits. This difference-less than 10% of the overall energetic contribution from ligand binding-might be due to the restriction on subunit arrangement imposed by the planar membrane; if this is the case, then the position effect is not expected in hemoglobin, in which each subunit is related equivalently to all the other subunits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.