ArticleNature communications2024
EEG decoders track memory dynamics.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Free recall of semantically related words reveals similarity structure.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Remoteness sensitive theta network dynamics during early autobiographical memory access.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Conformal and adhesive gel for stable electrophysiology on hairy animals without shaving.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Respiration Shapes the Neural Dynamics of Successful Remembering in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Reading specific memories from human neurons before and after sleep.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Neural biomarkers of age-related memory change.Psychology and aging · 2025Article
- Time-Resolved Aperiodic and Oscillatory Dynamics during Human Visual Memory Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- High-gamma and beta bursts in the left supramarginal gyrus can differentiate verbal memory states and performance.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- The Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Encoding- and retrieval-related neural activity jointly determine mnemonic success. We ask whether electroencephalographic activity can reliably predict encoding and retrieval success on individual trials. Each of 98 participants performed a delayed recall task on 576 lists across 24 experimental sessions. Logistic regression classifiers trained on spectral features measured immediately preceding spoken recall of individual words successfully predict whether or not those words belonged to the target list. Classifiers trained on features measured during word encoding also reliably predict whether those words will be subsequently recalled and further predict the temporal and semantic organization of the recalled items. These findings link neural variability predictive of successful memory with item-to-context binding, a key cognitive process thought to underlie episodic memory function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.