SynthesisInternational journal of nursing knowledge2025
Prevalence of NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of nursing knowledge, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of nursing knowledge · 2025Pooled it
- Association Between Nursing Diagnoses and Mortality in Patients with Cardiac Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis research quantitatively explored the prevalence of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses related to the care of patients experiencing heart failure.
designA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted with the systematic review protocol registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022382565).
methodsSystematic searches were performed between March and April 2022, including peer review for selection, quality assessment, data extraction, and analysis of all included studies. A subsequent meta-analysis was performed, focusing on the proportion of nursing diagnoses in patients with heart failure. The logistic random effects model with maximum likelihood estimation assessed the combined proportion, and heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using the I DATA SOURCES: PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, WOS, and Embase were used.
resultsOf the 11 studies that met the eligibility criteria, 44 nursing diagnoses were identified as most frequently occurring in patients experiencing heart failure, and only 16 diagnoses appeared in more than one publication. The combined mean proportion was 35.73% (95% CI = [26.67%; 48.56%]), indicating the presence of heterogeneity based on the I
conclusionThe results of the meta-analysis suggest priority diagnoses in individuals with heart failure, such as deficient knowledge (00126). Additionally, secondary diagnoses, such as activity intolerance (00092), excess fluid volume (00026), and ineffective breathing pattern (00032), were identified as responses to decreased cardiac output (00029). Less prevalent nursing diagnoses were associated with deterioration of health status and the need for hospitalization. OBJETIVO: Investigar cuantitativamente la prevalencia de diagnósticos de enfermería NANDA-I asociados con la atención de pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca. DISEÑO: Revisión sistemática y metanálisis. El protocolo de revisión sistemática quedó registrado en PROSPERO) número de registro: CRD42022382565). MÉTODOS: Se realizaron búsquedas sistemáticas entre marzo y abril de 2022, llevándose a cabo una revisión por pares sobre la selección, evaluación de calidad, extracción de datos y análisis de todos los estudios incluidos. Se realizó un metanálisis posterior centrado en la proporción de diagnósticos de enfermería en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca. El modelo logístico de efectos aleatorios con estimación de máxima verosimilitud evaluó la proporción combinada y la heterogeneidad entre los estudios se evaluó mediante el estadístico I FUENTES DE DATOS: PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, WOS, Embase. RESULTADOS: En los 11 estudios que cumplieron con los criterios de elegibilidad, se identificaron 44 diagnósticos de enfermería aunque sólo 16 diagnósticos aparecieron en más de una publicación. La proporción media combinada fue del 35,73% (IC del 95%) = [26,67%; 48,56%]), y el valor de I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.