ArticleNeurotoxicology2024
Olfactory tract/bulb metal concentration in Manganese-exposed mineworkers.
Article in Neurotoxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurodegenerative diseases and environmental risk factors: an overview of the available scientific evidence.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Manganese: biology, physiology and role in disease.Cell discovery · 2026Review
- Manganese-Induced Parkinsonism: A Review of Etiologies and Treatments.Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundManganese (Mn) is an essential micronutrient as well as a well-established neurotoxicant. Occupational and environmental exposures may bypass homeostatic regulation and lead to increased systemic Mn levels. Translocation of ultrafine ambient airborne particles via nasal neuronal pathway to olfactory bulb and tract may be an important pathway by which Mn enters the central nervous system.
objectiveTo measure olfactory tract/bulb tissue metal concentrations in Mn-exposed and non-exposed mineworkers.
methodsUsing inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), we measured and compared tissue metal concentrations in unilateral olfactory tracts/bulbs of 24 Mn-exposed and 17 non-exposed South African mineworkers. We used linear regression to investigate the association between cumulative Mn exposures and olfactory tract/bulb Mn concentration.
resultsThe difference in mean olfactory tract/bulb Mn concentrations between Mn-exposed and non-Mn exposed mineworkers was 0.16 µg/g (95% CI -0.11, 0.42); but decreased to 0.09 µg/g (95% CI 0.004, 0.18) after exclusion of one influential observation. Olfactory tract/bulb metal concentration and cumulative Mn exposure suggested there may be a positive association; for each mg Mn/m
conclusionsOur findings suggest that Mn-exposed mineworkers might have higher olfactory tract/bulb tissue Mn concentrations than non-Mn exposed mineworkers, and that concentrations might depend more on cumulative dose than recency of exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.