Trial reportOphthalmology2024
Visual Field Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study.
Trial report in Ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two-Year Outcomes of Phacogoniotomy vs Phacotrabeculectomy for Advanced Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma With Cataract: A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- Long-term visual field progression after Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy in refractory glaucoma.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- A retrospective evaluation of the clinical monitoring period prior to referral for glaucoma surgery with the emphasis on visual field test results.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo describe visual field outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (PTVT) Study.
designCohort analysis.
participantsA total of 155 eyes (155 subjects) randomly assigned to treatment with tube shunt surgery (n = 84) or trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (n = 71).
methodsThe PTVT Study was a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of trabeculectomy and tube shunt surgery in eyes without previous intraocular surgery. Subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP) at baseline and annually for 5 years. Standard automated perimetry tests were deemed reliable if the false-positive rate was ≤ 15%. Tests were excluded if visual acuity was ≤ 20/400 or loss of ≥ 2 Snellen lines from baseline because of a nonglaucomatous etiology. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare rates of change in SAP mean deviation (MD) between the 2 groups. Intraocular pressure (IOP) control was assessed by percentage of visits with IOP < 18 mmHg and mean IOP.
main outcome measuresRate of change in SAP MD during follow-up.
resultsA total of 730 SAP tests were evaluated (average of 4.7 tests per eye). The average SAP MD at baseline was -12.8 ± 8.3 decibels (dB) in the tube group and -12.0 ± 8.4 dB in the trabeculectomy group (P = 0.57). The mean rate of change in SAP MD was -0.32 ± 0.39 dB/year in the trabeculectomy group and -0.47 ± 0.43 dB/year in the tube group (P = 0.23). Eyes with mean IOP 14 to 17.5 mmHg had significantly faster rates of SAP MD loss compared with eyes with mean IOP < 14 mmHg (-0.59 ± 0.13 vs. -0.27 ± 0.08 dB/year; P = 0.012), and eyes with only 50% to 75% of visits with IOP < 18 mmHg had faster rates than those with 100% of visits with IOP < 18 mmHg (-0.90 ± 0.16 vs. -0.29 ± 0.08 dB/year; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified older age and worse IOP control as risk factors for faster progression in both treatment groups.
conclusionsNo statistically significant difference in mean rates of visual field change was observed between trabeculectomy and tube shunt surgery in the PTVT Study. Worse IOP control was significantly associated with faster rates of SAP MD loss during follow-up. Older patients were also at risk for faster progression. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.