Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38581920›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2024

Methadone dosing at New York State opioid treatment programs following initial revisions to federal regulations.

Ashly E Jordan, Marcus A Bachhuber, Ellenie Tuazon, Christian Jimenez, Pat Lincourt, Shazia Hussain, Jason Rubinfeld, Chinazo O Cunningham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ashly E JordanNew York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports, Albany, NY, USA. Electronic address: Ashly.Jordan@oasas.ny.gov.
Marcus A BachhuberNew York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports, Albany, NY, USA.
Ellenie TuazonNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, NY, USA.
Christian JimenezNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, NY, USA.
Pat LincourtNew York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports, Albany, NY, USA.
Shazia HussainNew York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports, Albany, NY, USA.
Jason RubinfeldNew York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports, Albany, NY, USA.
Chinazo O CunninghamNew York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports, Albany, NY, USA.

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA046356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn March 2020, a temporary federal regulatory exemption for opioid treatment programs (OTPs) was issued, allowing for a greater number of take-home methadone doses than was previously permitted. In the same month, to address financial sustainability, New York State (NYS) Medicaid also transitioned to a bundle reimbursement methodology for OTPs. We examined methadone dosing schedules in NYS before and after these regulatory and financing changes.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using NYS OTP patient data from two sources: the client data system for a baseline period (February 2020) and survey data collected after regulatory and financing changes (May 2020 to August 2021, 64 weekly surveys). We compared methadone dosing schedules over time using chi-square tests and Poisson regression.

resultAt baseline, data were available for 78% (n=77/99) of OTPs including 90.9% (n=26,225/28,839) of their enrolled patients. During the survey period, 99 OTPs completed 93.1% (n=5901/6336) of weekly surveys, with a mean statewide weekly patient census of 38,904 (SD=1214.5). Between February and May 2020, daily dosing significantly decreased from 55.4% to 16.3% of patients (-39.1 percentage points [95%CI: -39.8 to -38.4]), although it significantly increased subsequently (3.33%/4-weeks [95%CI: 3.28, 3.39]). In addition, weekly-to-monthly dosing significantly increased from 26.9% to 54.5% of patients (27.6 percentage points [95%CI: 26.9, 28.4]), although it significantly decreased subsequently (-1.19%/4-weeks [95%CI: -1.23, -1.15]). DISCUSSION: Despite large initial changes, we found a trend toward gradual return to more restrictive dosing schedules. OTPs need further support in leveraging new opportunities to improve methadone treatment and outcomes.

Indexed as

MedicaidMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew YorkRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidMethadoneHealth policyMethadoneOpioid Use DisorderOverdose

Identifiers

PMID38581920
PMCPMC11088491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.