ArticleJAMA cardiology2024
A Multimodal Video-Based AI Biomarker for Aortic Stenosis Development and Progression.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diastolic dysfunction is linked to the initiation and progression of aortic stenosis: a hypothesis.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Digital phenotyping of aortic stenosis-related remodeling reveals complementary structural, electrical, and hemodynamic signatures.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Predicting health and disease: a conceptual framework for AI in preventive and precision medicine.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Review
- Multi-omics analysis of genetic drivers linking aortic stenosis and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in heart failure.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Response by Oikonomou et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Echocardiography as a Surrogate for Multimodality Aortic Stenosis Imaging: Post Hoc Analysis of a Clinical Trial".Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Multi-view deep learning for echocardiogram interpretation.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced echocardiography in cardiovascular disease management.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Prognostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography-Derived Diastolic Dysfunction Grading and Trajectory in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Diagnosing Severe Low-Gradient vs Moderate Aortic Stenosis with Artificial Intelligence Based on Echocardiography Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Valvular Heart Disease with Cardiac Imaging.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Alterations in Cardiac Structure and Function Associated With Sub-Severe Aortic Stenosis Progression: The ARIC Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning Model to Identify Mitral Valve Prolapse From the Echocardiogram.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedicine: A Systematic Review from Nanomedicine to Neurology and Hepatology.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Automated evaluation for pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade with echocardiographic artificial intelligence.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Cardiovascular Care in Action: From Learning to Implementation in Health Systems.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography and echocardiography to track preclinical progression of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Utilizing multimodal artificial intelligence to advance cardiovascular diseases.Precision clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Deep learning for echocardiographic assessment and risk stratification of aortic, mitral, and tricuspid regurgitation: the DELINEATE-regurgitation study.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Aortic valve leaflet motion for diagnosis and classification of aortic stenosis using single view echocardiography.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Automated transformation of unstructured cardiovascular diagnostic reports into structured datasets using sequentially deployed large language models.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a major public health challenge with a growing therapeutic landscape, but current biomarkers do not inform personalized screening and follow-up. A video-based artificial intelligence (AI) biomarker (Digital AS Severity index [DASSi]) can detect severe AS using single-view long-axis echocardiography without Doppler characterization. Objective: To deploy DASSi to patients with no AS or with mild or moderate AS at baseline to identify AS development and progression. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a cohort study that examined 2 cohorts of patients without severe AS undergoing echocardiography in the Yale New Haven Health System (YNHHS; 2015-2021) and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC; 2018-2019). A novel computational pipeline for the cross-modal translation of DASSi into cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was further developed in the UK Biobank. Analyses were performed between August 2023 and February 2024. Exposure: DASSi (range, 0-1) derived from AI applied to echocardiography and CMR videos. Main Outcomes and Measures: Annualized change in peak aortic valve velocity (AV-Vmax) and late (>6 months) aortic valve replacement (AVR). Results: A total of 12 599 participants were included in the echocardiographic study (YNHHS: n = 8798; median [IQR] age, 71 [60-80] years; 4250 [48.3%] women; median [IQR] follow-up, 4.1 [2.4-5.4] years; and CSMC: n = 3801; median [IQR] age, 67 [54-78] years; 1685 [44.3%] women; median [IQR] follow-up, 3.4 [2.8-3.9] years). Higher baseline DASSi was associated with faster progression in AV-Vmax (per 0.1 DASSi increment: YNHHS, 0.033 m/s per year [95% CI, 0.028-0.038] among 5483 participants; CSMC, 0.082 m/s per year [95% CI, 0.053-0.111] among 1292 participants), with values of 0.2 or greater associated with a 4- to 5-fold higher AVR risk than values less than 0.2 (YNHHS: 715 events; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 4.97 [95% CI, 2.71-5.82]; CSMC: 56 events; adjusted HR, 4.04 [95% CI, 0.92-17.70]), independent of age, sex, race, ethnicity, ejection fraction, and AV-Vmax. This was reproduced across 45 474 participants (median [IQR] age, 65 [59-71] years; 23 559 [51.8%] women; median [IQR] follow-up, 2.5 [1.6-3.9] years) undergoing CMR imaging in the UK Biobank (for participants with DASSi ≥0.2 vs those with DASSi <.02, adjusted HR, 11.38 [95% CI, 2.56-50.57]). Saliency maps and phenome-wide association studies supported associations with cardiac structure and function and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients without severe AS undergoing echocardiography or CMR imaging, a new AI-based video biomarker was independently associated with AS development and progression, enabling opportunistic risk stratification across cardiovascular imaging modalities as well as potential application on handheld devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.