ArticleImmunologic research2024
Hormone and reproductive factors and risk of systemic lupus erythematosus: a Mendelian randomized study.
Article in Immunologic research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Late-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Biologics in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Recent Evolutions and Benefits.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune and inflammatory disease with a risk associated with hormonal and reproductive factors. However, the potential causal effects between these factors and SLE remain unclear. A two-sample Mendelian randomization study was conducted using the published summary data from the genome-wide association study database. Five independent genetic variants associated with hormonal and reproductive factors were selected as instrumental variables: age at menarche, age at natural menopause, estradiol, testosterone, and follistatin. To estimate the causal relationship between these exposure factors and disease outcome, we employed the inverse-variance weighted, weighted median, and MR-Egger methods. In addition, we carried out multiple sensitivity analyses to validate model assumptions. Inverse variance weighted showed that there was a causal association between circulating follistatin and SLE risk (OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.86, P = 0.033). However, no evidence was found that correlation between AAM (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.40, P = 0.798), ANM (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.06, P = 0.721), E2 (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 0.14 to 13.56, P = 0.772), T (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.28, P = 0.459), and SLE risk. Our study revealed that elevated circulating follistatin associates with an increased risk of SLE. This finding suggests that the regulatory signals mediated by circulating follistatin may provide a potential mechanism relevant to the treatment of SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.