Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38581594›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2024

Feasibility and acceptability of measuring prenatal stress in daily life using smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment and wearable physiological monitors.

Irene Tung, Uma Balaji, Alison E Hipwell, Carissa A Low, Joshua M Smyth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene TungDepartment of Psychology, California State University, Dominguez Hills, 1000 E. Victoria Street, Carson, CA, 90747, USA. itungphan@csudh.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1263-066X
Uma BalajiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alison E HipwellDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7179-1151
Carissa A LowDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joshua M SmythDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0904-5390
University of Pittsburgh · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Resilience to prenatal stress: Implications for offspring health and neurodevelopmentUH3OD023244 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ALISON E HIPWELL · 2018 to 2026
$15.1M
Maternal Stress Resilience During Pregnancy and Offspring Emotion RegulationK01MH123505 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TUNG, IRENE · 2021 to 2025
$840k
National Institute of Health UH3OD023244NIH HHS UH3 OD023244NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH123505NIMH NIH HHS K01MH123505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High levels of stress during pregnancy can have lasting effects on maternal and offspring health, which disproportionately impacts families facing financial strain, systemic racism, and other forms of social oppression. Developing ways to monitor daily life stress during pregnancy is important for reducing stress-related health disparities. We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of using mobile health (mHealth) technology (i.e., wearable biosensors, smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment) to measure prenatal stress in daily life. Fifty pregnant women (67% receiving public assistance; 70% Black, 6% Multiracial, 24% White) completed 10 days of ambulatory assessment, in which they answered smartphone-based surveys six times a day and wore a chest-band device (movisens EcgMove4) to monitor their heart rate, heart rate variability, and activity level. Feasibility and acceptability were evaluated using behavioral meta-data and participant feedback. Findings supported the feasibility and acceptability of mHealth methods: Participants answered approximately 75% of the surveys per day and wore the device for approximately 10 hours per day. Perceived burden was low. Notably, participants with higher reported stressors and financial strain reported lower burden associated with the protocol than participants with fewer life stressors, highlighting the feasibility of mHealth technology for monitoring prenatal stress among pregnant populations living with higher levels of contextual stressors. Findings support the use of mHealth technology to measure prenatal stress in real-world, daily life settings, which shows promise for informing scalable, technology-assisted interventions that may help to reduce health disparities by enabling more accessible and comprehensive care during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentFeasibility StudiesSmartphoneStress, PsychologicalTelemedicineWearable Electronic DevicesAdultFemaleHeart RateHumansMonitoring, AmbulatoryPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsYoung AdultEcological momentary assessmentFeasibilityMobile health technologyPregnancyPrenatal healthWearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID38581594
PMCPMC11697973
OpenAlexW4394013550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.