ArticleFolia microbiologica2024
Optimizing recombinant production of L-asparaginase 1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae using response surface methodology.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficient production of L-asparaginase using recombinant Pichia pastoris and strategy to eliminate glutaminase activity.Biotechnology letters · 2026Article
- L-asparaginase: a review of microbial production and protein engineering with translational applications for oncology and food safety.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- A Nanocarrier Enhances the Anti-Liver Cancer Efficacy of Mitoxantrone: An AcidicCurrent drug delivery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
L-asparaginase is an essential enzyme used in cancer treatment, but its production faces challenges like low yield, high cost, and immunogenicity. Recombinant production is a promising method to overcome these limitations. In this study, response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the production of L-asparaginase 1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Escherichia coli K-12 BW25113. The Box-Behnken design (BBD) was utilized for the RSM modeling, and a total of 29 experiments were conducted. These experiments aimed to examine the impact of different factors, including the concentration of isopropyl-b-LD-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), the cell density prior to induction, the duration of induction, and the temperature, on the expression level of L-asparaginase 1. The results revealed that while the post-induction temperature, cell density at induction time, and post-induction time all had a significant influence on the response, the post-induction time exhibited the greatest effect. The optimized conditions (induction at cell density 0.8 with 0.7 mM IPTG for 4 h at 30 °C) resulted in a significant amount of L-asparaginase with a titer of 93.52 μg/mL, which was consistent with the model-based prediction. The study concluded that RSM optimization effectively increased the production of L-asparaginase 1 in E. coli, which could have the potential for large-scale fermentation. Further research can explore using other host cells, optimizing the fermentation process, and examining the effect of other variables to increase production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.