ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024
Spinal dysraphism in congenital scoliosis and kyphosis: a retrospective analysis in an Indian population.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative Traction for Pediatric Spinal Deformity Correction: A Technical Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Prevalence and characteristics of scoliosis among ethiopian schoolchildren aged 6-15 Years: A school-based cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEarly recognition is crucial for occult spinal dysraphism associated with congenital spinal deformities. There is limited literature available on its occurrence in congenital scoliosis and kyphosis in the Indian population.
methodsOur study involved a retrospective review of 247 children who presented at a single centre. We analyzed their demographics and clinical and radiological findings, which included the type of deformity, its location, vertebral anomaly, Cobb angle, and MRI findings. The deformities were categorized as congenital scoliosis or congenital kyphosis with failure of formation, failure of segmentation, or both.
resultsA total of 247 cases were examined (congenital scoliosis-229, congenital kyphosis-18). The average age was seven years (range 0.8 to 19 years, SD 4.6). The mean Cobb angle at presentation in the congenital scoliosis group was 49.4° (range 8 to 145°, SD 23.77) for those with abnormal MRI and 42.45° (range 5 to 97°, SD 20.09) for those with normal MRI. For the congenital kyphosis group, the mean K angle at presentation was 47.7° (range 14 to 110°, SD 33.33) for those with abnormal MRI and 47.36° (range 15 to 70°, SD 16.63) for those with normal MRI. Abnormal MRI results were observed in 130 of the patients (congenital scoliosis-53.7%, congenital kyphosis-38.8%). The highest incidence of abnormal MRI findings was observed in the failure of segmentation (66.6%) and mixed (65%) types. Deformities in the dorsal region had the highest incidence (61.9%). The most common dysraphism instances were diastematomyelia and tethered cord. There was a significant correlation between type of deformity and presence of dysraphism.
conclusionThis is the largest case series of congenital scoliosis and kyphosis reported from India. We found a high incidence of occult spinal dysraphism as compared to other published series. Occult spinal dysraphism is more common in the thoracic region. Diastematomyelia followed by tethered cord was the most common anomaly observed. We recommend MRI screening of whole spine and craniovertebral junction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.