ArticleCancer research2024
Integration of Pan-Cancer Cell Line and Single-Cell Transcriptomic Profiles Enables Inference of Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in Heterogeneous Tumors.
Article in Cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Fanconi anemia pathway restrains MLL-rearranged leukemogenesis through suppressing non-homologous end joining-mediated genomic instability.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Decoding drug-responsive cell subpopulations in triple-negative breast cancer using single-cell multiomics.iScience · 2026Article
- scTumorDrug: predicting cell-type-specific drug responses for heterogeneous tumors.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of nuclei isolation methods for brain single-nucleus RNA sequencing.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Discovery of predictive biomarkers for cancer therapy through computational approaches.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Novel Mixed Cancer-Cell Models Designed to Capture Inter-Patient Tumor Heterogeneity for Accurate Evaluation of Drug Combinations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The applications of single-cell multiomics in drug screening.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2025Review
- Kidney diseases and single-cell sequencing research: a bibliometric analysis from 2015 to 2024.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Rethinking p16, p53, and HPV in HNCSCC through lessons from glioblastoma subclonal evolution toward patient-centric N-of-1 single-cell RNA sequencing paradigm.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Omics-Mediated Treatment for Advanced Prostate Cancer: Moving Towards Precision Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Pan-cancer analysis shapes the understanding of cancer biology and medicine.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Review
- Can astragalus polysaccharides truly boost the treatment of pancreatic cancer?World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Soft tissue sarcomas at the single-cell and spatial resolution: new markers and targets.Cancer gene therapy · 2025Review
- Computer-aided drug discovery strategies for novel therapeutics for prostate cancer leveraging next-generating sequencing data.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2024Review
- A review of computational methods for predicting cancer drug response at the single-cell level through integration with bulk RNAseq data.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) greatly advanced the understanding of intratumoral heterogeneity by identifying distinct cancer cell subpopulations. However, translating biological differences into treatment strategies is challenging due to a lack of tools to facilitate efficient drug discovery that tackles heterogeneous tumors. Developing such approaches requires accurate prediction of drug response at the single-cell level to offer therapeutic options to specific cell subpopulations. Here, we developed a transparent computational framework (nicknamed scIDUC) to predict therapeutic efficacies on an individual cell basis by integrating single-cell transcriptomic profiles with large, data-rich pan-cancer cell line screening data sets. This method achieved high accuracy in separating cells into their correct cellular drug response statuses. In three distinct prospective tests covering different diseases (rhabdomyosarcoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and castration-resistant prostate cancer), the predicted results using scIDUC were accurate and mirrored biological expectations. In the first two tests, the framework identified drugs for cell subpopulations that were resistant to standard-of-care (SOC) therapies due to intrinsic resistance or tumor microenvironmental effects, and the results showed high consistency with experimental findings from the original studies. In the third test using newly generated SOC therapy-resistant cell lines, scIDUC identified efficacious drugs for the resistant line, and the predictions were validated with in vitro experiments. Together, this study demonstrates the potential of scIDUC to quickly translate scRNA-seq data into drug responses for individual cells, displaying the potential as a tool to improve the treatment of heterogenous tumors. SIGNIFICANCE: A versatile method that infers cell-level drug response in scRNA-seq data facilitates the development of therapeutic strategies to target heterogeneous subpopulations within a tumor and address issues such as treatment failure and resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.