Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38581376›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2024

A Spatial Interpolation Approach to Assign Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Material Properties for Finite Element Models of Adeno-Associated Virus Infusion Into a Recurrent Brain Tumor.

Reed Chen, Julian A Rey, Ibrahim S Tuna, David D Tran, Malisa Sarntinoranont

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Reed ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 407 Towerview Rd, Box 97756, Durham, NC 27708.ORCID 0000-0003-0536-6119
Julian A ReyDepartment of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, 142 New Engineering Building, P.O. Box 116250, Gainesville, FL 32611.
Ibrahim S TunaDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, P.O. Box 100374, Gainesville, FL 32610-0374.
David D TranDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurological Surgery and Neurology USC Brain Tumor Center, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033.
Malisa SarntinoranontDepartment of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, 497 Wertheim, P.O. Box 116250, Gainesville, FL 32611.
University of Florida · USDuke University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

MRI Signatures of Response to High-Dose Radiotherapy in Rat Models of Cerebral TumorR01CA218596 · NCI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI BROWN, STEPHEN L, EWING, JAMES R · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a clinically useful gene delivery vehicle for treating neurological diseases. To deliver AAV to focal targets, direct infusion into brain tissue by convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is often needed due to AAV's limited penetration across the blood-brain-barrier and its low diffusivity in tissue. In this study, computational models that predict the spatial distribution of AAV in brain tissue during CED were developed to guide future placement of infusion catheters in recurrent brain tumors following primary tumor resection. The brain was modeled as a porous medium, and material property fields that account for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived anatomical regions were interpolated and directly assigned to an unstructured finite element mesh. By eliminating the need to mesh complex surfaces between fluid regions and tissue, mesh preparation was expedited, increasing the model's clinical feasibility. The infusion model predicted preferential fluid diversion into open fluid regions such as the ventricles and subarachnoid space (SAS). Additionally, a sensitivity analysis of AAV delivery demonstrated that improved AAV distribution in the tumor was achieved at higher tumor hydraulic conductivity or lower tumor porosity. Depending on the tumor infusion site, the AAV distribution covered 3.67-70.25% of the tumor volume (using a 10% AAV concentration threshold), demonstrating the model's potential to inform the selection of infusion sites for maximal tumor coverage.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDependovirusFinite Element AnalysisMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPorosityAAVbraincomputational modelconvection-enhanced deliverydrug deliveryfinite elementinterpolationsegmentationtumor

Identifiers

PMID38581376
PMCPMC11110824
OpenAlexW4394013790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.