Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38581054›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2024

Feedstock/pretreatment screening for bioconversion of sugar and lignin streams via deacetylated disc-refining.

Darren J Peterson, Changyub Paek, Ling Tao, Ryan Davis, Xiaowen Chen, Roman Brunecky, Matthew Fowler, Richard Elander

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Darren J PetersonNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO, 80401, USA. darren.peterson@nrel.gov.
Changyub PaekExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company, 1545 US 22 E, Annandale, NJ, 08801, USA.
Ling TaoNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO, 80401, USA.
Ryan DavisNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO, 80401, USA.
Xiaowen ChenNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO, 80401, USA.
Roman BruneckyNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO, 80401, USA.
Matthew FowlerNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO, 80401, USA.
Richard ElanderNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO, 80401, USA.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory · USExxonMobil (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent publications have shown the benefits of deacetylation disc-refining (DDR) as a pretreatment process to deconstruct biomass into sugars and lignin residues. Major advantages of DDR pretreatment over steam and dilute acid pretreatment are the removal of acetyl and lignin during deacetylation. DDR does not generate hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and furfural which are commonly produced from steam and dilute acid pretreatments. Acetate, lignin, HMF, and furfural are known inhibitors during enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation. Another advantage of deacetylation is the production of lignin-rich black liquor, which can be upgraded to other bioproducts. Furthermore, due to the lack of sugar degradation during deacetylation, DDR has significantly less sugar loss than other pretreatment methods. Previous studies for DDR have primarily focused on corn stover, but lacked the investigative studies of other feedstocks. This study was designed to screen various DDR process conditions at pilot scale using three different feedstocks, including corn stover, poplar, and switchgrass. The impact of the pretreatment conditions was evaluated by testing hydrolysates for bioconversion to 2,3-butanediol. Pretreatment of biomass by DDR showed high-conversion-yields and 2,3-BDO fermentation production yields. Techno-economic analysis (TEA) of the pretreatment for biomass to sugar was also developed based on NREL's Aspen Model. This study shows that the cellulose and hemicellulose in poplar was more recalcitrant than herbaceous feedstocks which ultimately drove up the sugar cost. Switchgrass was also more recalcitrant than corn stover but less than poplar.

Identifiers

PMID38581054
PMCPMC10998391
OpenAlexW4393998296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.