Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38581031›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2024

Brain-machine interface based on deep learning to control asynchronously a lower-limb robotic exoskeleton: a case-of-study.

Laura Ferrero, Paula Soriano-Segura, Jacobo Navarro, Oscar Jones, Mario Ortiz, Eduardo Iáñez, José M Azorín, José L Contreras-Vidal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Laura FerreroBrain-Machine Interface Systems Lab, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain. lferrero@umh.es.ORCID 0000-0003-2256-757X
Paula Soriano-SeguraBrain-Machine Interface Systems Lab, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain.
Jacobo NavarroNSF IUCRC BRAIN, University of Houston, Houston, USA.
Oscar JonesNSF IUCRC BRAIN, University of Houston, Houston, USA.
Mario OrtizBrain-Machine Interface Systems Lab, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4269-1554
Eduardo IáñezBrain-Machine Interface Systems Lab, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8057-5952
José M Azorín *Brain-Machine Interface Systems Lab, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5548-9657
José L Contreras-Vidal *NSF IUCRC BRAIN, University of Houston, Houston, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6499-1208
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF A way of making Europe PID2021-124111OB-C31Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities through the Aid for the Training of University Teachers FPU19/03165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis research focused on the development of a motor imagery (MI) based brain-machine interface (BMI) using deep learning algorithms to control a lower-limb robotic exoskeleton. The study aimed to overcome the limitations of traditional BMI approaches by leveraging the advantages of deep learning, such as automated feature extraction and transfer learning. The experimental protocol to evaluate the BMI was designed as asynchronous, allowing subjects to perform mental tasks at their own will.

methodsA total of five healthy able-bodied subjects were enrolled in this study to participate in a series of experimental sessions. The brain signals from two of these sessions were used to develop a generic deep learning model through transfer learning. Subsequently, this model was fine-tuned during the remaining sessions and subjected to evaluation. Three distinct deep learning approaches were compared: one that did not undergo fine-tuning, another that fine-tuned all layers of the model, and a third one that fine-tuned only the last three layers. The evaluation phase involved the exclusive closed-loop control of the exoskeleton device by the participants' neural activity using the second deep learning approach for the decoding.

resultsThe three deep learning approaches were assessed in comparison to an approach based on spatial features that was trained for each subject and experimental session, demonstrating their superior performance. Interestingly, the deep learning approach without fine-tuning achieved comparable performance to the features-based approach, indicating that a generic model trained on data from different individuals and previous sessions can yield similar efficacy. Among the three deep learning approaches compared, fine-tuning all layer weights demonstrated the highest performance.

conclusionThis research represents an initial stride toward future calibration-free methods. Despite the efforts to diminish calibration time by leveraging data from other subjects, complete elimination proved unattainable. The study's discoveries hold notable significance for advancing calibration-free approaches, offering the promise of minimizing the need for training trials. Furthermore, the experimental evaluation protocol employed in this study aimed to replicate real-life scenarios, granting participants a higher degree of autonomy in decision-making regarding actions such as walking or stopping gait.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesDeep LearningExoskeleton DeviceAlgorithmsElectroencephalographyHumansLower ExtremityBrain–machine interfaceDeep learningEEGExoskeletonTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID38581031
PMCPMC10996198
OpenAlexW4393979960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.