Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38580758›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy vs. Hartmann's procedure for acute diverticulitis: what happens after discharge? Results of a nationwide analysis.

Arturo J Rios Diaz, Lisa A Bevilacqua, Theodore E Habarth-Morales, Alicja Zalewski, David Metcalfe, Caitlyn Costanzo, Charles J Yeo, Francesco Palazzo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arturo J Rios DiazDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lisa A BevilacquaDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8470-3712
Theodore E Habarth-MoralesSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alicja ZalewskiDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David MetcalfeOxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Caitlyn CostanzoDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Charles J YeoDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Francesco PalazzoDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. francesco.palazzo@jefferson.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend resection with primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy over Hartmann's procedure if deemed safe for acute diverticulitis. The primary objective of the current study was to compare the utilization of these strategies and describe nationwide ostomy closure patterns and readmission outcomes within 1 year of discharge.

methodsThis was a retrospective, population-based, cohort study of United States Hospitals reporting to the Nationwide Readmissions Database from January 2011 to December 2019. There were 35,774 patients identified undergoing non-elective primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy or Hartmann's procedure for acute diverticulitis. Rates of ostomy closure, unplanned readmissions, and complications were compared. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to control for patient and hospital-level confounders as well as severity of disease.

resultsOf the 35,774 patients identified, 93.5% underwent Hartmann's procedure. Half (47.2%) were aged 46-65 years, 50.8% female, 41.2% publicly insured, and 91.7% underwent open surgery. Primary anastomosis was associated with higher rates of 1-year ostomy closure (83.6% vs. 53.4%, p < 0.001) and shorter time-to-closure [median 72 days (Interquartile range 49-103) vs. 115 (86-160); p < 0.001]. Primary anastomosis was associated with increased unplanned readmissions [Hazard Ratio = 2.83 (95% Confidence Interval 2.83-3.37); p < 0.001], but fewer complications upon stoma closure [Odds Ratio 0.51 (95% 0.42-0.63); p < 0.001]. There were no differences in complications between primary anastomosis and Hartmann's procedure during index admission [Odds Ratio = 1.13 (95% Confidence Interval 0.96-1.33); p = 0.137].

conclusionPatients who undergo primary anastomosis for acute diverticulitis are more likely to undergo ostomy reversal and experience fewer postoperative complications upon stoma reversal. These data support the current national guidelines that recommend primary anastomosis in appropriate cases of acute diverticulitis requiring operative treatment.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalColostomyIleostomyPatient ReadmissionAcute DiseaseAdultAgedDiverticulitisDiverticulitis, ColonicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesDiverticulitisDiverting ileostomyHartmann procedureHartmann reversal

Identifiers

PMID38580758
PMCPMC11078837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.