ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2024
Metacell-based differential expression analysis identifies cell type specific temporal gene response programs in COVID-19 patient PBMCs.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Key regulatory elements of the TGFβ-LRRC15 axis predict disease progression and immunotherapy resistance across cancer types.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Organ-Specific and Conserved Regulatory Logic Orchestrates Gene Expression in the Embryonic Mesothelium.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- The peptidoglycan ofScience translational medicine · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic exploration yields novel perspectives on the regulatory network underlying trichome initiation inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By profiling gene expression in individual cells, single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) can resolve cellular heterogeneity and cell-type gene expression dynamics. Its application to time-series samples can identify temporal gene programs active in different cell types, for example, immune cells' responses to viral infection. However, current scRNA-seq analysis has limitations. One is the low number of genes detected per cell. The second is insufficient replicates (often 1-2) due to high experimental cost. The third lies in the data analysis-treating individual cells as independent measurements leads to inflated statistics. To address these, we explore a new computational framework, specifically whether "metacells" constructed to maintain cellular heterogeneity within individual cell types (or clusters) can be used as "replicates" for increasing statistical rigor. Toward this, we applied SEACells to a time-series scRNA-seq dataset from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) after SARS-CoV-2 infection to construct metacells, and used them in maSigPro for quadratic regression to find significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) over time, followed by clustering expression velocity trends. We showed that such metacells retained greater expression variances and produced more biologically meaningful DEGs compared to either metacells generated randomly or from simple pseudobulk methods. More specifically, this approach correctly identified the known ISG15 interferon response program in almost all PBMC cell types and many DEGs enriched in the previously defined SARS-CoV-2 infection response pathway. It also uncovered additional and more cell type-specific temporal gene expression programs. Overall, our results demonstrate that the metacell-pseudoreplicate strategy could potentially overcome the limitation of 1-2 replicates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.