Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38580444›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2024

Surgeons' views of peer comparison and guideline-based feedback on postsurgery opioid prescriptions: a qualitative investigation.

Meghan Martinez, Allison Kirkegaard, Kathryn Bouskill, Xiaowei Sherry Yan, Zachary Wagner, Katherine E Watkins

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05070338 (Reducing Inappropriate Prescription Opioid Prescribing at Hospital Discharge), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05070338 nacompletednot on this map

Reducing Inappropriate Prescription Opioid Prescribing at Hospital Discharge

TypeinterventionalSponsorRANDRan2021 to 2023Enrolled640ConditionsOpioid PrescribingArmsGuideline-Based (Injunctive Norm) Nudges, Peer-Based (Social Norm) Nudges
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meghan MartinezPalo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute and Center for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1967-1018
Allison KirkegaardRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2924-9868
Kathryn BouskillRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Xiaowei Sherry YanCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Zachary WagnerRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Katherine E WatkinsBehavioral and Policy Sciences, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA kwatkins@rand.org.ORCID 0009-0005-7573-5292

Funding

REDUCING INAPPROPRIATE PRESCRIPTION OPIOID PRESCRIBING AT HOSPITAL DISCHARGER01DA046226 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI WATKINS, KATHERINE E · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcess opioid prescribing after surgery can lead to prolonged opioid use and diversion. We interviewed surgeons who were part of a three-group cluster-randomised controlled trial aimed at reducing prescribed opioid quantities after surgery via two versions of a monthly emailed behavioural 'nudge' (messages encouraging but not mandating compliance with social norms and clinical guidelines around prescribing) at the end of the implementation year in order to understand surgeons' reasoning for changing or continuing their prescribing behaviour as a result of the intervention and the context for their rationale.

methodsThe study took place at a large healthcare system in northern California with surgeons from three surgical specialties-orthopaedics, obstetrics/gynaecology and general surgery. Following the intervention period, we conducted semistructured interviews with 36 surgeons who had participated in the trial, ensuring representation across trial arm, specialty and changes in prescribing quantities over the year. Interviews focused on reactions to the nudges, impacts of the nudges on prescribing behaviours and other factors impacting prescribing. Three study team members coded and analysed the transcribed interviews.

resultsNudges were equally effective in reducing postsurgical opioid prescribing across surgical specialties and between intervention arms. Surgeons were generally receptive to the nudge intervention, noting that it reduced the size of their discharge opioid prescriptions by improving their awareness and intentionality around prescribing. Most were unaware that clinical guidelines around opioid prescribing existed. Some had reservations regarding the accuracy and context of information provided in the nudges, the prescription quantities encouraged by the nudges and feelings of being watched or admonished. A few described discussing the nudges with colleagues. Respondents emphasised that the prescribing behaviours are informed by individual clinical experience and patient-related and procedure-related factors.

conclusionsSurgeons were open to learning about their prescribing behaviour through comparisons to guidelines or peer behaviour and incorporating this feedback as one of several factors that guide discharge opioid prescribing. Increasing awareness of clinical guidelines around opioid prescribing is important for curbing postsurgical opioid overprescribing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05070338.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidSurgeonsDrug PrescriptionsFeedbackHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Analgesics, OpioidDecision makingRandomised controlled trialSurgery

Identifiers

PMID38580444
PMCPMC11002351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.