ArticleBJGP open2024
Factors for the integration of prevention in primary care: an overview of reviews.
Article in BJGP open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eligibility-Identification Difficulty and Self-Reported Preventive Care Implementation Among Japanese Primary Care Physicians.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
- Population-oriented health promotion and disease prevention interventions in primary healthcare: a scoping review of reviews.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Article
- How far on the road? The role of family medicine/general practice in 10 Central and Eastern European countries: A mixed-method study.The European journal of general practice · 2025Article
- Integrating prevention into primary care organizations: a case study in France.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global burden of non-communicable diseases is increasing and the need for prevention is huge. Policies have yet to produce results and prevention indicators remain low. Primary care (PC) represents an opportunity to optimise the practice of prevention, but GPs are coming up against barriers that are holding back their prevention practices.
aimTo identify the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of routine prevention practices in PC. DESIGN &
settingThis study is an international overview of reviews focusing on the integration of prevention in PC settings.
methodThe search was conducted in July 2022 using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Included reviews are systematic reviews or scoping reviews adopting a systematic approach.
resultsThe 35 reviews included identify multiple barriers and facilitators related to the integration of prevention in PC. These factors are heterogeneous with regard to their source (the patient, the professional, and the health system) and their level of action (individual, organisational, or contextual). The results show the need to organise PC at the professional level (for example, in training), at the local level (for example, the information system), and at the political level (for example, the unclear definition of the role of professionals).
conclusionThe factors influencing the integration of prevention in PC are multiple and act at different levels (individual, organisational, and health-system level). Organisation factors play a major role and seem to be a means of overcoming the difficulties encountered by healthcare professionals in developing preventive practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.