Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38580388›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2024

Qualitative study on shared decision making in cystitis management in general practice.

Tessa Mzxk van Horrik, Annelies Colliers, Marco H Blanker, Eefje Gpm de Bont, Antoinette A van Driel, Bart J Laan, Suzanne E Geerlings, Roderick P Venekamp, Sibyl Anthierens, Tamara N Platteel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tessa Mzxk van HorrikDepartment of Internal Medicine-Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands t.m.vanhorrik@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3496-2203
Annelies ColliersDepartment of Family Medicine & Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4960-2355
Marco H BlankerDepartment of Primary and Long-term Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1086-8730
Eefje Gpm de BontCAPHRI, Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-4752
Antoinette A van DrielErasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart J LaanDepartment of Internal Medicine-Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2357-8871
Suzanne E GeerlingsDepartment of Internal Medicine-Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8518-3576
Roderick P VenekampDepartment of General Practice & Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1446-9614
Sibyl AnthierensDepartment of Family Medicine & Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4762-1907
Tamara N PlatteelDepartment of General Practice & Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5122-0079

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCystitis is commonly treated with antibiotics, although non-antibiotic options could be considered for healthy non-pregnant women. Shared decision making (SDM) can be used in cystitis management to discuss the various treatment options but is not frequently applied in general practice.

aimTo identify barriers and facilitators for applying SDM in cystitis management in general practice. DESIGN &

settingQualitative explorative research in general practice with healthcare professionals (HCPs; GPs and GP assistants) and healthy non-pregnant women with a recent history of cystitis (patients).

methodIndividual semi-structured interviews were conducted between May and October 2022. We applied a combination of thematic and framework analysis.

resultsTen GPs, seven GP assistants, and 15 patients were interviewed. We identified the following three main barriers and one key facilitator: (1) applying SDM is deemed inefficient; (2) HCPs assume that patients expect antibiotic treatment and some HCPs consider non-antibiotic treatment inferior; (3) patients are largely unaware of the various non-antibiotic treatment options for cystitis; and (4) HCPs recognise some benefits of applying SDM in cystitis management, including reduced antibiotic use and improved patient empowerment, and patients appreciate involvement in treatment decisions, but preferences for SDM vary.

conclusionSDM is infrequently applied in cystitis treatment in general practice owing to the current focus on efficient cystitis management that omits patient contact, HCPs' perceptions, and patient unawareness. Nevertheless, both HCPs and patients recognise the long-term benefits of applying SDM in cystitis management. Our findings facilitate the development of tailored interventions to increase the application of SDM, which should be co-created with HCPs and patients, and fit into the current efficient cystitis management.

Indexed as

cystitisdecision making, sharedgeneral practiceprimary care nursingprimary health carequalitative researchurinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID38580388
PMCPMC11523517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.